Obama praises progress to secure nuclear materials
WASHINGTON — Hailing two decades of efforts to help the former Soviet Union secure nuclear weapons stockpiles, President Obama said on Monday that the world must continue to stand guard against nuclear threats — including terrorists who seek to gain control of nuclear weapons.
“We cannot let our guard down,” Obama said, calling efforts to combat nuclear terrorism one of his top priorities as president.
Obama praised the 20-year-old Cooperative Threat Reduction program, which has provided billions of dollars in equipment and know-how to help Russia and former Soviet bloc nations safeguard and dismantle nuclear and chemical weapons.
The program, initiated by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and former Sen. Sam Nunn, D-Ga., has helped deactivate more than 7,600 nuclear warheads.
Marking the program's 20th anniversary, Obama cited the “extraordinary progress” that's been made in securing nuclear materials and thanked Nunn and Lugar for their leadership.
In a speech at the National Defense University in Washington, the president called Nunn and Lugar “visionaries” who “challenged us to think anew” about ways to secure nuclear stockpiles produced during the Cold War.
The program Nunn and Lugar established provided reinforced rail cars to carry nuclear warheads, high-tech security systems for storage sites and helped pay for the dismantling of mothballed nuclear submarines and other weapons.
The program is set to expire this spring, and Russia has said it will not automatically extend it without a major overhaul.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Maine nurse defies Ebola quarantine with bike ride
- Unaccompanied immigrants put heavy strain on schools, charities
- Ebola virus could overwhelm health care system, AP finds
- FBI plays IT ‘nerd’ card to con way into Vegas villa
- Murky Pentagon contract ends in guilty verdicts
- 1st vaccine for deadly form of meningitis approved
- Terminally ill Oregon woman makes last wishes
- Congress rankings detail its ‘poorest’ federal lawmakers
- Responses to 2 storms fail, staffers say
- Ethics office finds ‘substantial reason to believe’ Georgia Republican
- N.M. deputy allegedly said, ‘I shot the guy’