Senate OKs defense bill; negotiations ahead with House
WASHINGTON — The Senate overwhelmingly approved a sweeping, $631 billion Defense bill on Tuesday that sends a clear signal to President Obama to move quickly to get combat troops out of Afghanistan, tightens sanctions on Iran and limits the president's authority in handling terror suspects.
Ignoring a veto threat, the Senate voted 98-0 for the legislation that would authorize money for weapons, aircraft and ships and would provide a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. After a decade of increasing Pentagon budgets, the vote was taken against the backdrop of significant reductions in projected military spending and the threat of deeper cuts from the looming fiscal cliff of automatic spending cuts and tax increases.
The bill reflects the nation's war-weariness after more than a decade of fighting in Afghanistan, the messy uncertainty about new threats to security and Washington belt-tightening in times of trillion-dollar-plus deficits. Spending solely on the base Defense budget has nearly doubled in the past 10 years, but the latest blueprint reins in the projected growth in military dollars.
The bill would provide about $526 billion for the base Defense budget, $17 billion for Defense programs in the Energy Department and about $88 billion for the war in Afghanistan. House and Senate negotiators must reconcile their competing versions of the bill in the next few weeks.
“The major challenge is time,” Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., told reporters after the vote.
Reacting to the relentless violence in Syria, the Senate voted 92-6 to require the Pentagon to report to Congress on the ability of the military to impose a no-fly zone over Syria.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who has pushed for greater military involvement to end the Syrian civil war, sponsored the amendment. Obama on Monday warned President Bashar Assad not to use chemical and/or biological weapons against his people as the United States and its allies weigh military options.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- Dusty Atlantic Ocean thwarts tropical storms
- Global lion population falling primarily because of loss of habitat, experts say
- Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
- Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
- Planned Parenthood recordings release halted by judge
- Fires’ fury unabated in California
- Baltimore slayings climb to level unseen in decades
- Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
- Amid 4-year drought, fears rise of trees dying, falling in California
- Feds eye use of federal dollars for ads for for-profit colleges