Suspect in California Indian reservation shooting dies from wounds
By The Associated Press
Published: Sunday, Dec. 9, 2012, 9:04 p.m.
PORTERVILLE, Calif. — A man suspected of fatally shooting three people and wounding three children, including his two daughters, died on Sunday from his wounds in a police shootout, authorities said.
Hector Celaya, 31, died several hours after he was wounded during gunfire with Tulare County sheriff's deputies.
Authorities were called to a trailer on the Tule Indian Reservation on Saturday night. Inside, they found the bodies of a man and a woman; the body of another man was nearby.
Deputies also discovered a wounded young boy, whose condition and age were not known.
Celaya shot his two daughters, ages 5 and 8, who were found with him in the vehicle when he was apprehended. One girl suffered life-threatening injuries, while the other girl was less seriously hurt.
A motive for the attacks was not known.
The winding roads out of the reservation delayed a medical helicopter from responding.
“This is one of those calls that will stick with you for the rest of your life,” said Shelby Charley Jr., an engineer and supervisor with the Tule River Reservation Fire Department.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- House foils Obama’s new power plant limits on carbon pollution
- Ovary removal aids women at high risk of cancer
- Ads tell Colo. pot users to keep off roads
- Former National Security Agency contractor Snowden’s leaks to cost billions, take years to fix
- Explosive-filled home incinerated in Calif.
- Because of crisis, world’s relations on verge of big shift
- Suspect charged in 2011 disappearance
- Maryland bill would link criminal, gun owners data