Obama, Boehner resume fiscal cliff talks
By The Associated Press
Published: Sunday, Dec. 9, 2012, 8:38 p.m.
WASHINGTON — President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner met on Sunday in the White House to discuss the ongoing negotiations over the impending “fiscal cliff,” the first meeting between just the two leaders since Election Day.
Spokesmen for Obama and Boehner said they agreed not to release details of the conversation, but emphasized that the lines of communication remain open.
The meeting happened as the White House and Congress try to break an impasse over finding a way to stop a combination of automatic tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to kick in at the beginning of next year.
Obama met in November with Boehner, as well as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. The president spoke by telephone with Reid and in person with Pelosi on Friday.
Obama has been pushing higher tax rates for the wealthiest Americans as one way to reduce the deficit — a position House Republicans have been steadfastly against. Republicans are demanding steeper cuts in costly government entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security.
One GOP senator said on Sunday that Senate Republicans would probably agree to higher tax rates on the wealthiest Americans if it meant getting a chance to overhaul entitlement programs.
The comments by Bob Corker of Tennessee — a fiscal conservative who has been gaining stature in the Senate as a pragmatic deal broker — puts new pressure on Boehner and other Republican leaders to rethink their long-held assertion that even the very rich shouldn't see their rates go up next year. GOP leaders have argued that the revenue gained by raising the top two tax rates would be trivial to the deficit, and that any tax increase hurts job creation.
But Corker said insisting on that red line — especially since Obama won re-election after campaigning on raising tax rates on the wealthy — might not be wise.
“There is a growing group of folks looking at this and realizing that we don't have a lot of cards as it relates to the tax issue before year end,” Corker told “Fox News Sunday.”
If Republicans agree to Obama's plan to increase rates on the top 2 percent of Americans, Corker added, “the focus then shifts to entitlements and maybe it puts us in a place where we actually can do something that really saves the nation.”
Besides getting tax increases through the Republican-dominated House, Corker's proposal faces another hurdle: Democrats haven't been receptive to GOP proposals on the entitlement programs. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., on Sunday was skeptical about proposals to increase the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 67.
“I just don't think we can do it in a matter of days here before the end of the year,” Durbin said.
And hard-line fiscal conservatives in the House are holding fast to their position.
“No Republican wants to vote for a rate tax increase,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, chairman of the House Republican Conference.
Added Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.: “I'm not sure there is support for the rate hikes. There is support for revenue by cleaning up the code.”
Still, at least one House Republican has said there is another way. Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma has said Obama and Boehner should agree not to raise tax rates on the majority of Americans and negotiate the rates for top earners later. Cole said on Sunday that most House Republicans would vote for that approach because it doesn't include a rate increase.
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., already has said he could support higher tax rates on upper incomes as part of a comprehensive plan to cut the federal deficit.
“Will I accept a tax increase as a part of a deal to actually solve our problems? Yes,” Coburn said. “But the president's negotiating with the wrong people. He needs to be negotiating with our bondholders in China, because if we don't put a credible plan on the discussion, ultimately, we all lose.”
Obama's plan would raise $1.6 trillion in revenue over 10 years, partly by letting decade-old tax cuts on the country's highest earners expire at the end of the year. He would continue those Bush-era tax cuts for everyone except individuals earning more than $200,000 and couples making above $250,000. The highest rates on top-paid Americans would rise from 33 percent and 35 percent to 36 percent and 39.6 percent.
Boehner has offered $800 billion in new revenues to be raised by reducing or eliminating unspecified tax breaks. The Republican plan would cut spending by $1.4 trillion.
Hensarling and Coburn spoke on ABC's “This Week.” Blackburn and Cole spoke on CNN's “State of the Union.” Durbin spoke on NBC's “Meet the Press.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sullivan case still relied on in libel claims
- World War II veteran receives once-declined Purple Heart
- Immigrant detainees on hunger strike
- John Denver tune finally an ‘official’ W.Va. state song
- Former National Security Agency contractor Snowden’s leaks to cost billions, take years to fix
- ‘Holy grail of guitars’ for sale in April auction
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Spyware in government computers ‘has Russian paw prints all over it’
- Deputy accused of illegal stops