ShareThis Page

NTSB: Mandate interlocks for those guilty of DUI

| Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012, 7:36 p.m.

WASHINGTON — All people convicted of drunken driving in the country should hve to have interlocks installed on their cars to prevent a repeat offense, the National Transportation Safety Board unanimously recommended on Tuesday.

The recommendation to state legislatures, which is non-binding, goes to 33 states that don't require interlock devices for all convicted offenders. The other 17 require the devices, which are aimed at deterring repeat offenses.

Interlocks are devices typically mounted on the vehicle's dashboard, which require motorists to breathe into them to test whether they have consumed alcohol. The device won't allow the vehicle to start until the motorist passes the test.

The NTSB is an independent federal agency that investigates crashes and transportation safety issues and makes recommendations to other government agencies, Congress and the states to improve safety in the skies, rails and roads.

The board's recommendation was based on a study of accidents involving wrong-way drivers, such as entering a highway on an exit ramp or simply veering into the opposing lane of traffic. The study found that these crashes, which usually occur at night or on weekends, kill an average of 360 people each year in 260 incidents.

“We initiated this series of investigations because wrong-way accidents are among the most deadly types of motor vehicle accidents — they usually occur at high speed and are primarily head-on collisions,” said Deborah Hersman, the board chairwoman.

The study analyzed 1,566 fatal wrong-way crashes that killed 2,139 people. One crash Oct. 14, 2011, in Fernley, Nev., killed a mother of two — in the second wrong-way crash in that city that night.

The report focused on wrong-way accidents in California, Colorado, Kentucky, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. Collisions that the board had investigated in detail involved 17 passenger vehicles, two buses, one church activity bus and four heavy vehicles.

Two common threads found in the report were drivers impaired by alcohol or elderly drivers.

About 60 percent of the accidents involved drivers with high blood-alcohol content. And not all drivers were tested, so board members say the percentage could be higher.

Drivers at least 70 years old were involved in 15 percent of the accidents.

The board urged state and local officials to improve signs around highway ramps, particularly those at T-intersections rather than clover-leaf exchanges. The board also urged GPS devices to have alerts when drivers enter roads going the wrong way.

“These will help older drivers, but it will help all of us,” Hersman said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.