Democrats, Republicans are split on stricter gun control
West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin joined a growing chorus of Democrats, including several in Pennsylvania, who say the country needs to tighten gun laws in response to the mass shooting at a Connecticut elementary school.
But Republicans say that before passing any laws, Congress needs to learn more about what happened on Friday, when Connecticut State Police say Adam Lanza shot 27 people and himself, including 20 first-graders in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown. Police say he killed the children with a semi-automatic rifle similar to the military's M-16.
“I just don't understand the civilian use for semiautomatic weapons, or these clips that hold 30 rounds. That's not how you hunt deer,” said Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills. Doyle said he supports reinstating a ban on military-style rifles that expired in 2004. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who wrote the 1994 ban, said on Sunday she plans to reintroduce it.
“If this young man went into his mother's house and all she had was a six-shooter and a hunting rifle, there would not have been this many dead,” Doyle said.
Connecticut's gun laws made it illegal for him to possess the weapons he used, said Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair. Police say he got the guns — a Bushmaster rifle and two semiautomatic pistols — from his mother after killing her.
“What wasn't being addressed was ... his mental illness. I don't want to get distracted” by gun control, said Murphy, a former child psychologist who treats military members suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. Untreated mental illness has been the thread in mass shootings from Virginia Tech, where a gunman in 2007 shot and killed 32 people and wounded 17, to Newtown, he said. “That is the key feature.”
Manchin and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, both National Rifle Association-endorsed Democrats, swung their support to reinstating the weapons ban. Rep. Bob Brady, D-Philadelphia, said Congress should go further by requiring more extensive background checks, closing the so-called gun show loophole — which allows people to buy guns at shows without a background check — and restricting gun purchases to one a month.
Guns such as the Bushmaster rifle don't “belong in anybody's hands unless they've got a uniform on and they're fighting for the United States,” Brady said.
President Obama, at a prayer vigil in Newtown on Sunday, pledged to “use whatever power this office holds” to prevent mass shootings, but neither he nor press secretary Jay Carney talked about specific steps Obama would support.
Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Butler, said it's too soon for specific proposals.
The shooting “has sparked a national debate about gun rights, the culture of violence our children are routinely exposed to and mental health treatment in America,” Kelly said.
“We need to review all of the facts surrounding this horrendous act of violence and continue to have an informed discussion about ways to prevent another devastating attack on innocent American lives.”
Others, including Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Hazleton, want a broader look at violence in general.
“We should look at every possibility, including violence in movies, on television and in video games. We need to look at how we address mental health issues,” Barletta said.
Mike Wereschagin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7900 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court will hear challenge to EPA’s power-plant rules
- Brown family blasts prosecutor; Wilson speaks
- 2 FBI agents shot, wounded in St. Louis area
- ‘Sex purchasers’ publicly shamed
- As snow melts, floods a growing concern in Buffalo
- In IRS ‘rife with scandal,’ staff to receive bonuses
- Ferguson grand jury focused on fatal ‘tussle’
- United Mine Workers responds to strike complaint