TribLIVE

| USWorld


Judge halts Alabama policy of segregating HIV-positive inmates, which violates federal disabilities law

About The Associated Press
The Associated Press 212-621-1500
Associated Press
The Associated Press



Contact Us | Video | RSS | Mobile


By The Associated Press

Published: Friday, December 21, 2012, 5:14 p.m.
Updated: Friday, December 21, 2012

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — A judge struck down Alabama's decades-old policy of segregating prison inmates with HIV, ruling on Friday that it violates federal disabilities law.

U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson ruled in favor of inmates who sued to end the long-standing practice and said he would give the state and inmate attorneys time to propose a way to bring state prisons into compliance with his order.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed the lawsuit on behalf of seven HIV-positive inmates, called the decision “historic.”

Prisons Commissioner Kim Thomas issued a statement saying corrections officials were studying the ruling and had not decided “our next course of action.

He said the department “is very disappointed with the conclusions and characterizations reached by the Court.”

“The men and women of the ADOC are not prejudiced against HIV-positive inmates, and have worked hard over the years to improve their health care, living conditions, and their activities,” Thomas said. “The ADOC remains committed to providing appropriate housing for all of its inmates, including the HIV-positive population, ensuring that these inmates receive a constitutional level of medical care and that the correctional system in Alabama does not further contribute to the current HIV epidemic in our State.”

Alabama and South Carolina are the only states that segregate HIV-positive prisoners. The class-action lawsuit accused the state of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

“It spells an end to a segregation policy that has inflicted needless misery on Alabama prisoners with HIV and their families,” said ACLU attorney Margaret Winter, who was lead counsel for the plaintiffs during a monthlong trial.

Neither the lawsuit or the judge's ruling mentions South Carolina.

Most Popular Nation

  1. Hurricane forecast: Another busy Atlantic season
  2. Fire chief says search almost complete in Oklahoma
  3. WVU baseball players spring into action in tornado-ravaged Oklahoma
  4. Senators want VA backlog erased
  5. Pennsylvania trooper injured in North Carolina accident
  6. 1 SEAL dead, 7 injured in training crash at Kentucky fort
  7. Powerball officials: 80 percent of number combinations picked
  8. Massive tornado roars through Oklahoma City suburb
  9. FBI kills Florida friend of Boston Marathon bomber
  10. U.S. admits drones killed 4 Americans
  11. Terrorists given new identities allowed to board commercial flights, watchdog finds
You must be signed in to add comments

To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.

There are currently no comments for this story.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.