Maine landlord kills 2 over parking in driveway during snowstorm, police say
PORTLAND, Maine — A 74-year-old man shot and killed two tenants inside an apartment he rented out in his home, possibly over a dispute about where they parked their cars during a snowstorm, state police said on Sunday.
James Pak, who had been in a standoff at his suburban home in Biddeford, about 15 miles south of Portland, was arrested about 10 p.m. Saturday, police said.
He is charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of Derrick Thompson, 19, and Thompson's girlfriend, Alivia Welch, 18.
Thompson's mother, Susan Johnson, 44, called police to report the shootings about 7 p.m. She and her 6-year-old son also live in the apartment, which is attached to the main house where Pak lived.
Before the shootings, police were called to Pak's home because of a dispute between Pak and his tenants over their cars being parked in his driveway during the snowstorm, said state police spokesman Steve McCausland.
Biddeford banned street parking during the night so crews could plow the streets.
Minutes after officers left the home, they received the call reporting the shootings.
Biddeford police rescued Johnson and her young son, and Pak retreated to his part of the house, where he lived with his wife, McCausland said.
Pak's wife left the home, and he surrendered hours later, said McCausland.
Johnson was being treated for a gunshot wound in a Portland hospital, officials said. Her younger son was not hurt.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Feds to protect 20 coral species
- DuPont fined $1.275M for W.Va. chemical releases
- Johns’ ex-aide admits thefts
- GMOs: Science and skepticism
- Powerful GOP leaders linked to tax-avoidance
- Cause of Ohio plane crash that killed 4 Case Western Reserve students unknown
- Insurers can discourage sickest patients from enrolling
- Louisiana Gov. Jindal sues Obama over Common Core
- Texas man cleared of shooting drunken driver who killed his 2 sons
- Retailers warned about software
- Health law credits stand to lower tax refunds