Deal reached on farm bill
WASHINGTON — Leaders on the Senate and House Agriculture committees announced a deal on Sunday to extend the 2008 farm bill by a year, an agreement that could avoid a surge in market prices for milk and other commodities.
The measure, which has to be approved by votes in both chambers of Congress, would give lawmakers another year to iron out a deal. The 2008 farm bill expired on Sept. 30, but a failure to have a law in place would have its biggest impact on the agricultural sector next year, beginning with milk.
Dairy subsidies under the 2008 farm bill expire on Monday, and without a bill in place, prices paid by the government to farmers would revert to 1949 levels. Economists have warned that the price consumers pay for milk could double as a result. Wheat and other commodities would be affected later in 2013.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California issues mandatory water restrictions
- LA museum acquires lost 18th-century masterpiece, in lawyer’s family for generations
- Homeland Security, Secret Service fight subpoenas from Rep. Chaffetz
- Obama targets cyber attackers with sanctions
- Former teachers convicted in Atlanta test scandal
- Key New Jersey Senator Menendez, Florida eye doctor indicted for bribery
- New York City police detective loses badge over Uber driver rage
- National park entry fees on rise as summer nears
- Feds won’t prosecute former IRS official Lerner for contempt
- Getty heir wrote last month of alleged ‘grave risk’ of death
- Experts skeptical of N.D.’s new oil train safety checks