Chesapeake Bay quality shows slight improvement
By The Associated Press
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 7:42 p.m.
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The health of the Chesapeake Bay improved slightly last year, with underwater grasses the only area suffering a setback, according to an assessment released on Wednesday by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. The report sounded cautious optimism for a decades-old effort now under tougher federal guidance.
Bay grasses were hurt by high water temperatures in the lower bay and heavy rains that washed sediment and pollution into local waterways. All other indicators either improved or stayed the same, with crabs, oysters and oxygen levels in bay water all seeing gains.
The foundation gave the bay an overall score of 32 out of 100, up one point over the last report in 2010 and four points since 2008.
“The bay is still dangerously out of balance, the rivers and streams are still impaired, but it's getting better and that's the good news,” Chesapeake Bay Foundation President William C. Baker said, adding that the new federally led bay restoration strategy is beginning to work.
The strategy being led by the Environmental Protection Agency sets pollution limits for everyone in the six-state bay watershed. Farmers and agriculture interests are concerned because farm runoff is the single largest source of bay pollutants, according to the EPA's Chesapeake Bay model. And while agriculture has cut its pollution, the strategy calls for even more reductions from all sectors. County officials have also expressed cost concerns.
The foundation said its 2013 priorities include working with lawmakers in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia to make sure money is available for local communities and to identify cost-effective strategies.
LeeAnn Murray, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation's acting director for Pennsylvania, said the state has made progress, but nearly a quarter of its streams and rivers are impaired. Pennsylvania priorities include helping local governments cut storm water runoff and farmers reduce agricultural pollution.
The bay watershed also covers parts of Delaware, New York and West Virginia.
The report looked at 13 indicators, of which five improved, seven stayed the same, and only bay grasses declined.
The bay's striped bass population got the best score at 69, unchanged from 2010. Oxygen levels in bay water registered the biggest improvement, increasing six points, but still only received 25 out of a possible 100 points.
That was in spite of big storms that led to predictions of large low oxygen areas known as “dead zones,” Baker said.
“The bay is showing a certain resilience which we haven't seen in many years,” Baker said. “That gives me pause, that gives me reason to be optimistic.''
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Automaker GM’s wait on Saturn Ion safety recall took years
- Judge strikes down Minnesota’s anti-coal law as unconstitutional
- Fox fires exec who used email to plan aid
- Drug crime reclassification to help ex-cons get vote rights
- Health care law enrollee passwords at risk for Heartbleed Internet security flaw, feds warn
- First date in New Jersey ends with him pilfering her TV and Yorkshire terrier
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- IRS, other agencies award contracts to license plate tracking company
- Washington’s snowy owl recovers from apparent bus crash, returns to wild
- Del Taco customers mistakenly charged thousands for fast-food meals