TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Judge: Obama doesn't have to disclose justification for 'kill' attacks on terrorists

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

NEW YORK — A federal judge has ruled that President Obama's administration doesn't have to publicly disclose its legal justification for the drone attacks and other methods it has used to kill terrorism suspects overseas.

Two New York Times reporters and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a 2011 request under the Freedom of Information Act that sought any documents in which Department of Justice lawyers had discussed the highly classified “targeted-killing” program.

The requests followed a drone strike in Yemen that killed an al-Qaida leader, Anwar Al-Awlaki, who had been born in America. That attack prompted complaints from some law scholars and human rights activists that, away from the battlefield, it was illegal for the United States to kill American citizens without a trial.

Those demands for documents were turned down, on the grounds that releasing any details about the program, or even acknowledging that documents on the subject existed, could harm national security.

In a decision signed Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon chided the Obama administration for refusing to provide the documents but said she had no authority to order them disclosed.

“I find myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem because of contradictory constraints and rules — a veritable Catch-22,” the judge wrote. “I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our Government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret.”

The judge kept one small part of the ACLU's document request alive, pertaining to a pair of Department of Defense documents that are not classified, but said she was obligated to reject the remainder of the requests because of national security secrecy rules.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Scientists achieve cloning advance for use in treating diseases
  2. Husband accused in slaying ate pot candy, police say
  3. Deal reached in Ukraine crisis talks, but U.S. remains wary of Russia’s end game
  4. Reid calls Nevada rancher’s supporters ‘terrorists’ over armed confrontation
  5. Heroin-related deaths set record in Ohio
  6. Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
  7. National Portrait Gallery features abstract expressionism of familiar faces
  8. Clinton donor pleads guilty in illegal campaign contributions
  9. Wyoming evacuees wary of slow landslide
  10. Drought uncovers fatal crash scene
  11. Another arrest made in abduction of N.C. prosecutor’s father
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.