TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Judge: Obama doesn't have to disclose justification for 'kill' attacks on terrorists

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

NEW YORK — A federal judge has ruled that President Obama's administration doesn't have to publicly disclose its legal justification for the drone attacks and other methods it has used to kill terrorism suspects overseas.

Two New York Times reporters and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a 2011 request under the Freedom of Information Act that sought any documents in which Department of Justice lawyers had discussed the highly classified “targeted-killing” program.

The requests followed a drone strike in Yemen that killed an al-Qaida leader, Anwar Al-Awlaki, who had been born in America. That attack prompted complaints from some law scholars and human rights activists that, away from the battlefield, it was illegal for the United States to kill American citizens without a trial.

Those demands for documents were turned down, on the grounds that releasing any details about the program, or even acknowledging that documents on the subject existed, could harm national security.

In a decision signed Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon chided the Obama administration for refusing to provide the documents but said she had no authority to order them disclosed.

“I find myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem because of contradictory constraints and rules — a veritable Catch-22,” the judge wrote. “I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our Government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret.”

The judge kept one small part of the ACLU's document request alive, pertaining to a pair of Department of Defense documents that are not classified, but said she was obligated to reject the remainder of the requests because of national security secrecy rules.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. FCC plays net traffic cop
  2. Foreign government gifts to family charity present candidacy hurdle for Hillary Clinton
  3. White House won’t snub pro-Israel lobby
  4. French bulldog joins top 10 list in U.S.
  5. Regulators approve tougher rules for Internet providers
  6. Heavy snow cuts power, snarls travel across South
  7. Russian threat via cyber on the rise, says U.S. intelligence assessment
  8. Huge agave plant that waited 80 years to flower has month to live
  9. Vote puts federal prosecutor Lynch closer to Attorney General’s Office
  10. Devoted California couple dies within 5 hours of each other
  11. Impasse over funding for Department of Homeland Security likely will go to wire