Giffords meets with families of victims in Newtown, Connecticut
NEWTOWN, Conn. — Nearly two years after being critically wounded in a mass shooting, former Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords on Friday met with the families of victims in last month's shooting that left 26 people dead inside a Connecticut elementary school.
Giffords was accompanied by her husband, astronaut Mark Kelly, to the private meeting that was attended by Sen. Richard Blumenthal.
“As always, I was deeply impressed by the strength and courage and resolve of the families and the extraordinary caring and generosity of Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly in visiting with them,” Blumenthal said.
Giffords met earlier in the day with officials from the state, including Connecticut's lieutenant governor and Newtown's first selectman.
Giffords was left partially blind, with a paralyzed right arm and brain injury, when a gunman opened fire during a constituent meet-and-greet outside a Tucson grocery store on Jan. 8, 2011. Arizona's chief federal judge and five others were killed and 13 peoplewere injured.
The gunman, Jared Lee Loughner, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven consecutive life sentences.
Kelly said on the day of the Newtown shooting that it should lead to better gun control.
On his Facebook page, he called for “a meaningful discussion about our gun laws and how they can be reformed and better enforced to prevent gun violence and death in America.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.