House gets 10 new gun control bills
WASHINGTON — Ten bills dealing with gun control were among the first introduced in the 113th Congress, according to a review of documents filed on the first day of the session.
All but two of the measures introduced by House lawmakers on Thursday advocated for more restrictions on firearms and were pushed by Democrats.
Freshman Republican Reps. Steve Stockman of Texas and Thomas Massie of Kentucky introduced bills to implement plans closer to that of the National Rifle Association, calling for the removal of “gun-free school zones.”
Gun regulation foes have argued that trained armed staff or security personnel could prevent school shootings like the one that killed 26 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
The remaining eight bills advocate more restrictions and tougher laws for those who sell, own or want to own firearms.
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., reintroduced a package of bills that includes language to strengthen background checks, bans on high-capacity magazine clips and Internet purchases of ammunition.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- House demands details of Taliban detainees swap for Bergdahl
- ‘Organic’ tag on water-raised produce raises ire
- Hostility at VA lingers, panel told
- Study a surprise: Commercial bees unfazed by pesticides
- Footage of protesters walking on flag sparks strife at Georgia university
- 15 buffalo that escaped from farm killed in upstate N.Y.
- Baltimore resident’s death in police custody draws hundreds in protests
- Magma chamber spied under Yellowstone volcano
- Unhappiness over plan to unfreeze billions in oil revenue for Iran threatens nuclear bill in Senate
- Florida fraternity members spit on disabled veterans at retreat
- Administration turns up heat on Medicaid expansion