Share This Page

Interior plots fast-track review of Shell's woes in the Arctic

| Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013, 7:22 p.m.

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is starting a fast-track review of Shell's troubled Arctic drilling efforts as a result of a grounded drilling rig, a failed spill equipment test and other problems.

But the administration made clear Tuesday that despite all the struggles it still supports the controversial push to explore for oil in the waters off Alaska. “The administration is fully committed to exploring for potential energy resources in frontier areas such as the Arctic,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said.

The Interior Department will do an “expedited, high-level assessment,” with a focus on Shell's numerous challenges, Salazar said in a written statement Tuesday. He said it will be led by Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Director Tommy Beaudreau and completed within 60 days.

“Exploration allows us to better comprehend the true scope of our resources in the Arctic and to more fully understand the nature of the risks and benefits of development in this region, but we also recognize that the unique challenges posed by the Arctic environment demand an even higher level of scrutiny,” Salazar said.

Shell's drilling rig Kulluk broke free from its towline and was grounded for several days before being hauled off the rocks on Sunday. Shell's other drilling rig, the Noble Discoverer, has had safety and pollution issues and is the subject of an investigation. And in September, the spill containment dome on Shell's response barge, the Arctic Challenger, was, according to an internal email by a federal regulator, “crushed like a beer can” during testing off Washington state.

Shell spokesman Curtis Smith said Tuesday that the company welcomes the Interior Department's review. He said it would help Shell strengthen its efforts.

“While we completed our drilling operations off the North Slope safely and in accordance with robust permitting and regulatory standards, we nevertheless experienced challenges in supporting the program, especially in moving our rigs to and from the theater of operations,” Smith said.

Environmental groups are calling for the Obama administration to immediately suspend Arctic drilling efforts.

“A government review is appropriate, but it doesn't take much examination of Shell Oil's myriad mistakes and mishaps to realize that no oil company can match the Arctic Ocean and the hazards that come with it,” Chuck Clusen of the Natural Resources Defense Council said Tuesday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.