TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

U.S. might not leave any troops in Afghanistan after 2014

Related .pdfs
Can't view the attachment? Then download the latest version of the free, Adobe Acrobat reader here:

Get Adobe Reader

Daily Photo Galleries

By McClatchy Newspapers
Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013, 8:48 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — The White House said for the first time on Tuesday that it's possible that no U.S. troops will be left in Afghanistan after 2014. The statement appeared to be a bid to pressure Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept American terms for keeping forces in his country to train Afghan security forces and prevent a return of al-Qaida.

The acknowledgement that a “zero option” of troops is being considered was made a day before Karzai begins a state visit to Washington that concludes with talks on Friday at the White House with President Obama.

The United States is seeking an accord under which any troops remaining in Afghanistan after December 2014 — when a pullout of the U.S.-led NATO combat force is to be completed — would be subject to the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice, not Afghan law.

The Obama administration is believed to want provisions allowing special forces to launch raids against al-Qaida or other foreign terrorist groups without Karzai's permission and for the United States to detain high-value suspected extremists.

Karzai is demanding that the United States turn over high-value terrorist suspects that it retained last year after it turned over control of a major detention center to the Afghan government. He has long demanded a say on night raids by special forces, and he's demanding the closure of small U.S. military outposts in the countryside.

Obama is considering a number of options for maintaining American troops in Afghanistan after 2014 to train Afghan security forces and mount operations to prevent a return by al-Qaida and other foreign extremists, said Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser.

The U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Marine Gen. John Allen, reportedly has presented options calling for keeping between 6,000 and 20,000 troops in the country.

Rhodes, however, confirmed that Obama could decide not to keep any soldiers there.

“We wouldn't rule out any option,” Rhodes said. “We're not guided by the goal of a certain number of U.S. troops in the country. We're guided by the objective that the president has set: disrupt, dismantle, defeat al-Qaida.”

He said that those objectives “could be met in a range of ways,” an apparent reference to the possibility of using pilotless drone aircraft based outside Afghanistan to hit al-Qaida targets and using private contractors or other countries to train Afghan security forces.

Douglas Lute, a retired Army general who is Obama's top coordinator on Afghanistan policy, noted in the same briefing that Obama decided against keeping a military training mission in Iraq after its government refused to allow its members to be covered by U.S. military law.

“As we know from our Iraq experience, if there are no authorities granted by the sovereign state, then there's no room for a follow-on U.S. military mission,” Lute said.

Both said they expected no decision on the troop level for several months.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Scathing report says college trustees fail in mission
  2. ISIS beheads American photojournalist who was kidnapped 2 years ago in Syria
  3. Fuel oil spills into Ohio River
  4. Latest Ferguson protests are smaller, more subdued
  5. Lighthouse sale draws $78K bid off cost of Portland, Maine
  6. Monsoon rains wreak havoc in Arizona
  7. Justice to alter removal process for no-fly list
  8. NRA’s ad campaign targets Bloomberg’s push to unify advocates of gun control
  9. Ex-Va. first lady sought credit for loan, sister-in-law says
  10. Police identify officer who fatally shot unarmed Missouri man
  11. Daughters more diligent than sons about elder care, study says
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.