Briton gets 33 months for bid to sell arms parts to Iran
EL PASO — A federal judge sentenced a British businessman to nearly three years in prison on Wednesday for trying to buy surface-to-air missile parts from undercover American agents to resell to Iran.
Christopher Tappin, 66, pleaded guilty in November to aiding and abetting to export military materials in a deal that opened the door for him to serve part of his sentence in Britain near his ailing wife. U.S. District Judge David Briones said he would recommend that the Department of Justice approve any request by Tappin to be transferred to the United Kingdom.
Tappin read a brief statement during the sentencing hearing in which he apologized for the crime.
“I regret my actions and the impact they had on my family,” he said. “I am looking forward to putting this incident behind me and returning to my previous unblemished life and my wife.”
As part of the plea deal, prosecutors agreed not to oppose any request by Tappin to serve part of his 33-month sentence in Britain. Along with approval from the Department of Justice, Tappin needs approval from the British government to serve time in one of its prisons.
In 2006, Tappin associate Robert Gibson contacted a company set up by undercover U.S. agents to buy batteries for surface-to-air missiles. Tappin provided undercover agents with false documents to deceive authorities and circumvent the requirement for the batteries to be licensed by the U.S. government before being exported.
“We hope this sends a message to people that are selling defense materials that we monitor sales and shipments, and that we are watching,” federal prosecutor Greg McDonald said.
Tappin must pay an $11,357 fine, the amount he would have profited from the sale.
Gibson and a third man implicated in the plot also were sentenced to prison terms.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reports: Actor Ford seriously injured in small-plane crash in L.A.
- Dems keep blocking joint negotiations on immigration orders
- Modified endoscope linked to deadly ‘superbug’ outbreak lacked FDA approval
- Latest winter blast strands airline passengers, motorists
- $4.8M in gold taken in armored truck hijacking in North Carolina
- Weapon supply vulnerable to hackers, Pentagon official warns
- EPA ripped for evading request for information
- Hillary Clinton may have broken federal record-keeping laws, New York Times reports
- Clinton portrait refers to Lewinsky scandal, Philadelphia artist says
- Blankenship: US prosecution ‘selective and vindictive’
- Dig uncovers ancient stone tool in eastern Oregon