Boston under emergency for flu
Four-year-old Gabriella Diaz sits as registered nurse Charlene Luxcin, right, administers a flu shot at the Whittier Street Health Center in Boston, Mass., Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013. Boston declared a public health emergency Wednesday as the city tried to deal with a harsh flu season and the state reported 18 flu-related deaths so far. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)
Photo by AP
BOSTON — Massachusetts' capital has declared a public health emergency on Wednesday as flu season has struck in earnest.
The state has reported 18 flu-related deaths so far.
Boston officials are working with health care centers to offer free flu vaccines and to set up places where people can get vaccinated. There have been four flu-related deaths, all elderly residents, since the unofficial start of the flu season Oct. 1.
“The best thing you can do to protect yourself and your family is to get the flu shot,” said Mayor Thomas Menino.
The state capital is experiencing its worst flu season since at least 2009, Menino said, with about 700 confirmed cases, compared with 70 all of last season.
Barbara Ferrer, director of Boston's public health commission, said the emergency was declared to get attention. She said the confirmed cases represent only those reported, but thousands of other people might be ill.
Massachusetts is one of 29 states reporting high levels of “influenza-like illness,” said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's weekly flu report.
The CDC said the proportion of people visiting health care providers with flu-like symptoms climbed from 2.8 percent to 5.6 percent in four weeks. The rate peaked at only 2.2 percent during the relatively mild 2011-12 flu season.
City, state and federal officials have all identified a Type A influenza known as H3N2 as the predominant strain this season.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.