TribLIVE

| USWorld

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Federal judges leery of release of post-killing bin Laden photos

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By McClatchy Newspapers
Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013, 7:50 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — Skeptical-sounding federal judges on Thursday considered whether the public can see pictures of terror mastermind Osama bin Laden taken after he had been shot dead by Navy SEALs in a raid on his hideout two years ago.

The 52 pictures, some described as “graphic” and “gruesome” by a top CIA official, highlight a Freedom of Information Act fight that climaxes just as Hollywood's version of bin Laden's death hits movie theaters. But while Hollywood's depiction has attracted both critical acclaim and political heat and was accomplished with the CIA's help, the real-world pictures snapped by elite commandos seem destined to remain secret.

“They're telling us it's a risk ... that Americans will die if we release these documents,” Judge Merrick Garland said Thursday, adding that “when the government tells us this is likely to lead to death, shouldn't we defer to that (even) more than when they say it will result in the release of secret information?”

Judge Judith Rogers, who like Garland was appointed by a Democratic president, further cited “the concern that these images could be used as propaganda.” Echoing arguments made by Obama administration officials, Rogers suggested that the propaganda concern is aggravated by the late bin Laden's prominence as al-Qaida's leader.

The explicit fears raised by two members of a three-judge appellate panel during oral arguments provided a strong indication, though no guarantee, that the court will side with the Obama administration in keeping the bin Laden photos secret.

Rejecting the Freedom of Information Act bid from a legal advocacy group called Judicial Watch would add to the cloak draped around other politically sensitive military and spy actions since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. 2 women advance to final phase of Army Ranger training
  2. Name of cop withheld in shooting of motorist in South Carolina
  3. Marines finally ready to roll out controversial fighter jet
  4. State Department accuses top Clinton aide of violations
  5. 4 dead, 65 sickened in Bronx by Legionella
  6. Food industry players fighting proposed dietary guidelines drop millions on lobbyists
  7. Pressure mounts for Biden to join 2016 White House race
  8. Obama’s nuclear deal lobbying sways Democrats
  9. Construction of giant bridges sparks curiosity, high demand for public tours
  10. U.S., Hong Kong researchers develop computer model to examine spread of influenza
  11. Midwest farmers pessimistic of fall harvest amid damaging, long-term rain