$1 trillion platinum coin? Don't bank on it
The Treasury Department and Federal Reserve oppose the idea of minting platinum coins as a way to avoid the debt ceiling, according to a statement from Treasury spokesman Anthony Coley.
“Neither the Treasury Department nor the Federal Reserve believes that the law can or should be used to facilitate the production of platinum coins for the purpose of avoiding an increase in the debt limit,” Coley said in an email.
Amid Republican opposition to raising the debt ceiling without spending cuts, some Democrats, including House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, have proposed invoking the Constitution's 14th amendment and minting a platinum coin with a face value of $1 trillion to pay government bills.
The U.S. reached the statutory borrowing limit on Dec. 31 and the Treasury Department is using what it calls “extraordinary” measures to finance the government. The Congressional Budget Office estimates those steps will be exhausted by mid-February.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Senate on track to approve Keystone XL by week’s end
- Thieves go for the gold in San Francisco
- New York legislative Speaker Silver to give up position because of federal corruption charges
- Wisconsin’s Walker takes first step toward possible run in 2016
- Slain Ga. couple known for charity projects
- Pentagon puts ‘fork’ in news about ex-captive Bergdahl
- Drone owner still unnamed, works for intelligence agency
- Democrats, Republicans openly snipe about congressional Benghazi investigation
- Boehner acknowledges early House GOP ‘stumbles’
- House sales tax proposal criticized as attack on states’ rights
- Dems delay Iran sanctions proposal