$1 trillion platinum coin? Don't bank on it
The Treasury Department and Federal Reserve oppose the idea of minting platinum coins as a way to avoid the debt ceiling, according to a statement from Treasury spokesman Anthony Coley.
“Neither the Treasury Department nor the Federal Reserve believes that the law can or should be used to facilitate the production of platinum coins for the purpose of avoiding an increase in the debt limit,” Coley said in an email.
Amid Republican opposition to raising the debt ceiling without spending cuts, some Democrats, including House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, have proposed invoking the Constitution's 14th amendment and minting a platinum coin with a face value of $1 trillion to pay government bills.
The U.S. reached the statutory borrowing limit on Dec. 31 and the Treasury Department is using what it calls “extraordinary” measures to finance the government. The Congressional Budget Office estimates those steps will be exhausted by mid-February.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- New York, New Jersey order 21-day quarantine of all in contact with Ebola virus
- Seattle area school homecoming ‘prince’ guns down classmates
- Warhol bodyguard sued over hidden artwork
- Philadelphia Mafia figure returned to prison for meeting friend
- Lawyer turns down AG post
- North Korea may have key to nuclear missile, general says
- 2 California deputies slain, suspect captured
- Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
- 1686 shipwreck ‘like dinosaur’ being rebuilt for museum
- Washington city takes stock of damage from rare tornado
- U.S. rules out apology to Pyongyang in exchange for 2 imprisoned Americans