Roman Catholic priest, ex-teacher set for sex abuse trial in Philadelphia
PHILADELPHIA — A troubled police officer's son who accuses two Roman Catholic priests and a teacher of raping him during boyhood is set to testify at a Philadelphia trial this week — and have his startling claims challenged for the first time.
The young man, identified by the pseudonym Billy in a 2011 grand jury report, testified in a landmark priest-abuse case last year. But in a strategic move, lawyers for the church official on trial never cross-examined him.
Monsignor William Lynn's lawyers doubted Billy's story, but they feared their questions would open the door for jurors to learn that one of the accused priests had taken a plea deal.
Lynn later became the first U.S. church official ever convicted over his handling of abuse complaints. He's serving three to six years in prison for endangering Billy's safety by moving the Rev. Edward Avery, a suspected pedophile, to St. Jerome's Parish.
“I thought I did something wrong — and it's a priest,” Billy testified about his 1999 encounter with Avery. “I didn't think anyone would believe me.”
The other two rape suspects will go on trial on Monday, and Billy's credibility — under potentially fierce cross-examination — may determine the outcome.
The Rev. Charles Engelhardt, an Oblate of St. Francis, and Bernard Shero, Billy's sixth-grade teacher, have pleaded not guilty to rape, indecent assault, child endangerment and other charges.
Both Engelhardt, 66, of Wyndmoor and Shero, 49, of Levittown rejected plea offers of 7½ to 15 years in prison, and face far more time if convicted. A gag order prevents them or their lawyers from commenting on the case.
In the adult Billy, the jury will see an accuser who's spent much of his life battling drugs, alcohol and arrests for petty crimes. By his own count, he's been in rehab nearly three dozen times. He told the jury in Lynn's trial that he had started smoking marijuana at 11, a year after the abuse began. He then moved on to heroin, painkillers and other drugs.
According to the grand jury report, Billy's abuse began after Engelhardt caught the 10-year-old drinking altar wine at St. Jerome's Parish in northeast Philadelphia. The priest let him get drunk, showed him pornography and assaulted him the next week after Mass, the report stated. Months later, it was Avery's turn, the report said. Avery twice assaulted the boy after Mass, after forcing him to do a striptease, according to the report and Billy's testimony.
The abuse by Shero allegedly started a year later, when the teacher offered him a ride home. Shero instead took him to a park where he raped him, the grand jury said.
Billy has a civil lawsuit pending against the Philadelphia Archdiocese that's on hold until after the criminal trial. His civil lawyer has described him as ready, if nervous, to testify.
“He's been through it once, but in a very different scenario,” lawyer Slade McLaughlin said last fall, as an earlier trial date approached.
He did not immediately return a call for comment on Friday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. clears police officer in Ferguson case, criticizes police force
- Top Senate Republican to states: Ignore EPA carbon rules
- Tsarnaev’s lawyer admits he carried out Boston bombing
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Case on Obamacare tax subsidies heads to Supreme Court
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Physicians’ organization cites shortages of doctors will grow, mostly in senior care
- Feds raid ‘maternity hotels’ in Ca.
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Supreme Court justices split on states’ panels to prevent gerrymandering
- Railroad measure awaits House approval