Hospital patients rarely told about medication errors
Published: Sunday, Jan. 13, 2013, 6:12 p.m.
NEW YORK — Patients and their families are rarely told when hospitals make mistakes with their medicines, according to a new study.
Most medication mistakes did not harm patients, the researchers found, but those that did were more likely to happen in intensive care units. And ICU patients and families were less likely to be told about errors than patients in other hospital units.
“For the most part, our findings were in keeping with what the existing literature tells us about the where and how of medication errors in a hospital,” wrote Dr. Asad Latif, the study's lead author.
“The most surprising finding was what we do about them, at least in the immediate time around when they occur,” added Latif of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore.
Using a database of about 840,000 voluntarily reported medication errors from 537 hospitals between 1999 and 2005, the researchers found that ICUs accounted for about 56,000, or 6.6 percent, of the errors. The rest happened in non-ICU units of the hospital.
The vast majority of the mistakes — about 98 percent — did not lead to a patient's being harmed, but those that did were more likely to happen in the ICUs, the researchers reported in Critical Care Medicine.
About 4 percent of the errors in ICUs ended up harming a patient, compared with about 2 percent of errors in non-ICU wards. That's not surprising, given the fragile condition of ICU patients and the more intensive treatment they receive, the authors note.
Of errors that may have led to patient deaths, 18 occurred in ICUs and 92 in non-ICU areas of the hospital.
In ICUs and non-ICUs, errors of omission — failing to give a patient the medication — were most common. Harmful errors most often involved devices like IV lines and mistakes in calculating medication dosages.
More than half of the time, no actions were taken after an error. In fact, only a third of the hospital staff who made the reported mistakes were immediately told about their errors.
“And the patient and/or their family is immediately informed when an error occurs barely 2 percent of the time, despite literature supporting full disclosure and their desire to be promptly informed,” Latif said.
Still, Latif said it would be premature for patients and their families to be concerned based just on their findings.
“Studies like this give us the opportunity to find out how we are actually doing, compared to how we think we are doing,” he said. “They help us discover associations between the outcomes we are interested in and their potential causes and consequences.”
Recent research has found that instituting a blame-free reporting system in hospitals increases the number of reported mistakes.
According to the new paper, one prior study demonstrated that medication errors can add an extra $2.8 million in costs at a single hospital.
Latif added that the health care system is always trying to reduce medication mistakes.
“However, nothing is fool-proof as we show in our study; there is always the human factor to take into account. The key is what we do if they do happen and to keep striving for perfection,” Latif said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- D.C. cherry bloom peak forecast for April 8-12
- ‘Drug czar’ cleared to lead Border Patrol
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- Volunteers reconstruct World War II bomber plane
- Because of crisis, world’s relations on verge of big shift
- 5 more Duke Energy plants cited
- Justices decline to hear Hazleton anti-immigrant case
- Bin Laden’s son-in-law goes on trial
- Shutdown cost national parks at least $414M