Gun control plan an 'obligation'
WASHINGTON — President Obama pledged on Wednesday to put the full weight of his office behind the nation's most aggressive gun-control plan in generations as he hopes to decrease the number of mass shootings and acts of random violence that occur every day in America.
He proposed banning assault weapons, limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds, requiring background checks on all gun purchases, penalizing those who buy guns from unlicensed dealers, hiring 1,000 more school resource officers and spending millions more on training, research and counseling.
The sweeping package — much of which needs approval from a divided Congress — was presented a month since a slaughter at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., left 26 people, including 20 children, dead.
In an emotional midday speech at the White House, a somber Obama recalled the innocent Americans who have been killed in a string of mass shootings: at a movie theater last summer in Aurora, Colo.; at a Sikh temple a few weeks later in Oak Creek, Wis.; at a shopping center last month in Clackamas, Ore.; and at Virginia Tech in 2007.
He told a roomful of crime victims, activists and lawmakers that 900 more people had been shot to death in the 33 days since the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.
“While there is no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely, no piece of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil, if there is even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there is even one life that can be saved, then we've got an obligation to try,” Obama said, standing near four young children who had written him letters after the Newtown shooting.
As he closed, he told the audience that the parents of one of the slain children in Newtown had given him a painting by their daughter. Her name was Grace and she was 7. The painting now hangs in his private study.
Obama's announcement set off a fierce debate on Capitol Hill, where Republicans and some Democrats oppose changes that they fear would chip away at the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Leaders of the Democratic-led Senate expect to begin debate in two weeks, though some bills may not even get a vote in the Republican-run House of Representatives.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, released only a brief statement from an aide.
“House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations. And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that,” spokesman Michael Steel said.
Some Republicans struck a conciliatory tone, suggesting that school safety and mental health services might be addressed, but others expressed blunt opposition.
“President Obama is targeting the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens instead of seriously addressing the real underlying causes of such violence,” said Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. “Rolling back responsible citizens' rights is not the proper response to tragedies committed by criminals and the mentally ill.”
Freshman Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, said he would “seek legislation barring funds to enforce the orders. I will seek legislation to cut White House funding should the president issue and enforce such orders. I will support legal efforts to overturn the orders in court.”
If all that fails, Stockman said, he would seek to impeach the president.
The United States has more firearms than any other nation — 270 million, according to the international Small Arms Survey, an independent research project at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva. Background checks to purchase firearms have soared in the last month, after potential buyers became worried about possible new restrictions.
In a statement Wednesday, the politically powerful National Rifle Association accused the president of “attacking firearms and ignoring children.”
During his first term, Obama avoided the contentious subject of gun control.
But since the Newtown massacre, the president has embarked on a risky move.
White House officials say the package of “common-sense proposals” is aimed at taking guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them, getting “weapons of war” off the streets, making schools safer and offering more mental health services. The new proposals will cost an estimated $500 million. Administration officials said they didn't know how many lives would be saved if the measures were enacted.
In addition to proposing legislation, Obama signed 23 executive actions that don't need congressional approval. Some lawmakers complained that he was making an end run around them.
They include making it easier for federal and state agencies to make data available to the national background-check system, beginning a national campaign for safe and responsible gun ownership, reviewing safety standards for gun locks and gun safes, and nominating a director to fill a years-long vacancy at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
A Pew poll released this week showed mixed reactions to many of the president's proposals. But Republicans, Democrats and independents overwhelmingly support background checks for private sales, preventing people with mental illness from buying guns and having more police officers in schools.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Man told transit police the Boston Marathon bomber ‘was my best friend’
- Mont. senator’s thesis appears to have been plagarized
- Autistic twin men locked up in Maryland home
- Head of troubled CDC anthrax lab quits
- Troubled childhoods may prompt men to volunteer for military service
- Mountaineer workers fear smoking ban will harm ‘livelihood’
- Can Georgia GOP ‘outsider’ Perdue best Democrats’ Nunn?
- U.S. knew Islamist militants planned offensive in Iraq, lawmakers told
- Obamacare enrollees strain Medicaid in Oregon
- GM orders Caddy dealers to stop selling some CTS versions
- Black-market coolant for air conditioners could catch fire, FBI warns