Dallas woman guilty in stepson's dehydration death
DALLAS — A Dallas woman was convicted Friday in the dehydration death of her 10-year-old stepson, who was denied water for days during record-high temperatures.
Jurors deliberated more than two hours before finding Tina Marie Alberson, 44, guilty of second-degree felony injury to a child in the July 2011 death of Jonathan James.
Alberson faces up to life in prison because of a previous felony conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
Police thought Jonathan's death was heat-related until the medical examiner's report.
Alberson testified in her own defense. She told jurors she limited Jonathan's water intake only a few times as punishment for misbehaving. Alberson said she saw him drinking water when he wasn't in “time-out” and saw no sign he was in medical distress.
The boy's fraternal twin brother, now 12, testified that Jonathan repeatedly asked for water and even pretended to use the bathroom to sneak a drink from the faucet. Joseph James told jurors he was concerned for his brother's health but was too afraid of Alberson to do anything.
After her stepson died, Alberson was charged with first-degree felony injury to a child, in which someone knowingly or recklessly causes harm that creates a substantial risk of death. It carries a maximum penalty of life in prison.
The lesser charge for which Alberson was convicted carries a maximum 20-year prison sentence, but jurors can sentence her to a maximum of life in prison because she previously was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
The boy's father, Michael Ray James, 43, is set for trial next month.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.