Labor's membership numbers fall to 1930s level
WASHINGTON — Union membership plummeted last year to the lowest level since the 1930s as cash-strapped state and local governments shed workers and unions had difficulty in organizing new members in the private sector despite signs of an improving economy.
Government figures released on Wednesday showed union membership declined from 11.8 percent to 11.3 percent of the workforce, another blow to a labor movement stretched thin by battles in Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan and other states to curb bargaining rights and weaken union clout.
Overall membership fell by about 400,000 workers to 14.4 million, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. More than half of the loss, about 234,000, came from government workers, including teachers, firefighters and public administrators.
Unions also had losses in the private sector, even as the economy created 1.8 million jobs in 2012. That membership rate fell from 6.9 percent to 6.6 percent, a troubling sign for the future of organized labor, as job growth generally has taken place at nonunion companies.
“To employers, it's going to look like the labor movement is ready for a knockout punch,” said Gary Chaison, professor of industrial relations at Clark University in Worcester, Mass. “You can't be a movement and get smaller.”
Union membership was 13.2 percent in 1935 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the National Labor Relations Act. Labor's ranks peaked in the 1950s, when about 1 of every 3 workers was in a union. By 1983, roughly 20 percent of workers were union members.
Losses in the public sector are hitting unions particularly hard because that has been one of the few areas where membership had grown over the past two decades. About 51 percent of union members work in government, where the rate of union membership is 37 percent, more than five times higher than in the private sector.
Until recently, there had been little resistance to unions organizing government workers. That began to change when Republican Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin signed a law in 2011 eliminating most union rights for government workers. The state lost about 46,000 union members last year, with the vast majority in the public sector.
The recession that began in 2008 also led to much deeper cuts in state and local governments than any previous recession, according to a report this month from the Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York at Albany. Since August 2008, state government employment has declined by 135,000, while local government employment fell by 546,000.
Despite the steady membership decline, unions remain a potent political force because of the money they spend in helping union-friendly candidates seeking public office. Unions spent more than $400 million during the 2012 election cycle.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Baltimore on edge: National Guardsmen take up positions
- Supreme Court hears historic same-sex marriage arguments
- Riot erupts in Baltimore after funeral for man hurt in police custody
- Obamacare contraception ruling thrown out
- Study a surprise: Commercial bees unfazed by pesticides
- Top Tulsa sheriff’s aide quits under fire
- Government fluoride standard lowered
- Man formally charged with murder of Indiana student
- ‘Organic’ tag on water-raised produce raises ire
- Storm knocks out power to New Orleans airport for hours
- Iowa avian flu outbreak might be spreading