Pentagon to open combat positions to women
WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is lifting its ban on women serving in combat, opening hundreds of thousands of front-line positions and potentially elite commando jobs after generations of limits on their service, Defense officials said on Wednesday.
The changes, set to be announced on Thursday by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, will not happen overnight. The services must develop plans for allowing women to seek the combat positions, a senior military official said.
Some jobs may open as soon as this year, while assessments for others, such as special operations forces, including Navy SEALS and the Army's Delta Force, may take longer. The services will have until January 2016 to make a case that some positions should remain closed to women.
The groundbreaking move recommended by the Joint Chiefs of Staff overturns a 1994 rule prohibiting women from being assigned to smaller ground combat units.
There long has been opposition to putting women in combat, based on questions of whether they have the necessary strength and stamina for certain jobs, or whether their presence might hurt unit cohesion.
But as news of Panetta's expected order got out, members of Congress, including the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., announced their support.
“It reflects the reality of 21st century military operations,” Levin said.
Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, who will be the top Republican on the Armed Services panel, said, however, that he does not believe this will be a broad opening of combat roles for women because there are practical barriers that have to be overcome in order to protect the safety and privacy of all members of the military.
Panetta's move occurs in his final weeks as Pentagon chief and just days after President Obama's inaugural speech in which he spoke about equal rights for all. The order expands the department's action of nearly a year ago to open about 14,500 combat positions to women, nearly all of them in the Army. Panetta's decision could open more than 230,000 jobs, many in Army and Marine infantry units, to women.
In addition to questions of strength and performance, there have been suggestions that the American public would not tolerate large numbers of women being killed in war.
Under the 1994 Pentagon policy, women were prohibited from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level. A brigade is about 3,500 troops split into several battalions of about 800 soldiers each. Historically, brigades were based farther from the front lines, and they often included top command and support staff.
The necessities of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, however, propelled women into jobs as medics, military police and intelligence officers that were sometimes attached — but not formally assigned — to battalions. So while a woman couldn't be assigned as an infantryman in a battalion going out on patrol, she could fly the helicopter supporting the unit or move in to provide medical aid if troops were injured.
And these conflicts, where battlefield lines are blurred and terrorists can lurk around every corner, have made it almost impossible to keep women clear of combat.
Still, it will not be an easy transition. When the Marine Corps sought women to go through its tough infantry course last year, two volunteered, and both failed to complete the course. And there may not be a wide clamoring from women for the more intense, dangerous and difficult jobs — including some infantry and commando positions.
In the Navy, however, women have begun moving into the submarine force, with several officers beginning to serve.
Jon Soltz, who served two Army tours in Iraq and is the chairman of the veterans group VoteVets.org, said it may be difficult for the military to carve out exceptions to the rule. And while he acknowledged that not all women are interested in pursuing some of the gritty combat jobs, “some of them are, and when you're looking for the best of the best, you cast a wide net. There are women who can meet these standards, and they have a right to compete.”
Two lawsuits were filed last year challenging the Pentagon's ban on women serving in combat, adding pressure on officials to overturn the policy. And the military services have been studying the issue and surveying their forces to determine how it may affect performance and morale.
A senior military official familiar said the chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps laid out three main principles to guide them as they move through the process:
• That they were obligated to maintain America's effective fighting force.
• That they would set up a process that would give all service members the best chance to succeed.
• That they would preserve military readiness.
Women compose about 14 percent of the 1.4 million active military personnel. More than 280,000 women have been sent to Iraq, Afghanistan or to neighboring nations in support of the wars. Of the more than 6,600 who have been killed, 152 have been women.
“Not every woman makes a good soldier, but not every man makes a good soldier. So women will compete,” said Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif. “We're not asking that standards be lowered. We're saying that if they can be effective and they can be a good soldier or a good Marine in that particular operation, then give them a shot.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- FBI blames North Korea for Sony hack
- NYC teenager a liar, not a penny stocks whiz worth $72M
- Computer hackers’ attack on Sony ‘merits an appropriate response,’ White House says
- New York move to ban fracking heartens critics
- Attorney General Holder, Justice Department target bias against transgender employees
- Federal regulators pen rules for Cuba trade, tourism
- West Virginia man dies after being shot with arrow in Wellsburg
- Congress’ legacy: Way worse than ‘do-nothing’ one of 1947-48
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Feds design college ratings system
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar