Mumbai plotter gets 35 years, not life
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, 8:52 p.m.
CHICAGO — Minutes before an American was sentenced to 35 years in prison for helping plan an attack on Mumbai, India, one of his victims tearfully pleaded for a harsh punishment despite the terrorist plotter's widespread cooperation with U.S. investigators after his arrest.
David Coleman Headley, 52, shifted uncomfortably in a gray tracksuit and kept his eyes fixed on the Chicago courtroom floor on Thursday as he listened to an American children's author describe the violent chaos during her 2008 trip to India.
Bullets flew past her check, and panicked diners dived under tables as gunmen burst into a hotel restaurant, executing people one by one, said Linda Ragsdale, almost shouting as she stood just a few feet from Headley during the sentencing hearing.
“I know the sweet sickening smell of gunfire and blood,” said Ragsdale, 53, of Nashville, who was shot through the chest — the bullet passing along her spine and then out her thigh. “I know what a bullet can do to every part of the human body ... These are things I never needed to know, never needed to experience.”
She did not comment later as the judge imposed the sentence, but others victimized by the attack that has been called India's 9/11 said they were disturbed and upset that Headley did not get the maximum life sentence he faced. With credit for good behavior, he could walk out of prison before he turns 80.
“He lost his right to live life as a free man. He doesn't deserve to be let out. He gave up that right when he played a role in the attack,” said Kia Scherr, whose husband, Alan Scherr, and 13-year-old daughter, Naomi, were at the same table as Ragsdale and died.
It was prosecutors who pressed for leniency, saying they wanted Headley to get no more than 35 years as credit for his almost immediate cooperation after his 2009 arrest and providing intelligence about terror networks, including the Pakistani-based group that mounted the attack. Rewarding Headley with the hope of at least a few years of freedom, the said, would encourage future suspects in terrorist cases to spill their secrets.
A somber Judge Harry Leinenweber sounded reluctant about imposing the lesser sentence, saying the Mumbai assault was so unfathomable and terrifying that, “perhaps the lucky ones were the ones who didn't survive.”
“I don't have any faith in Mr. Headley when he says he's a changed person and believes in the American way of life,” he said.
Ragsdale, the only victim to address the court during the hearing, also read a text message from Kia Scherr to the judge, in which Scherr implored the court not to give Headley less than life in prison and asserting that anything less “would be an appalling dishonor.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Congress renews undetectable gun ban for decade
- 18 L.A. sheriff’s deputies draw federal charges
- Air pollution measures due in court
- Government sells remaining stake in GM
- Iranian foreign minister says nuke deal dead if new sanctions imposed
- Veteran held in North Korea says statement was coerced
- Budget deal possible on Tuesday, aides say
- Feds curtail paper applications for health care law
- Suspense builds for pipeline report
- Ex-San Diego mayor, a Pittsburgh native, avoids jail in sexual harassment
- Florida congressman loses $18M in stock scheme