Pentagon: Budget crisis could hurt war effort
WASHINGTON — The war effort in Afghanistan eventually would be harmed by across-the-board budget cuts, even as the Obama administration intends to shield the military's combat mission from the reductions, the Pentagon's No. 2 official said Friday.
“There will be second-order effects on the war,” Ashton Carter, deputy Defense secretary, said in an interview in his office with a small group of reporters. Deferred maintenance on weapons and other equipment, for example,would erode the combat fitness of military units deploying to Afghanistan, he said.
The United States has about 66,000 troops in Afghanistan, with an undetermined number of withdrawals expected this year and in 2014.
The administration holds out hope that Congress will come up with a deficit-cutting mechanism to replace the across-the-board spending cuts due to take effect March 1.
Carter, though, suggested that hopes are not high.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, repeatedly have warned that the threatened Defense cuts — amounting to about $50 billion this budget year — would hurt national security. Carter said he fears that the message has not been heard widely enough in Congress and across the country.
If the cuts take effect in March, hundreds of thousands of Pentagon civilian employees would face furloughs and reduced paychecks by April, said Carter. They would lose one day of work per week for the remainder of the budget year, which ends in September.
“This is painful to us,” Carter said.
The Pentagon has about 800,000 civilian employees; they have not yet been officially notified of furloughs. Carter said the furloughs would save $5 billion. No military positions would be cut.
Carter said the Pentagon 4is eliminating all 46,000 of its temporary civilian workers in anticipation of budget cuts.
Carter said he will remain on the job as deputy defense secretary. He had been mentioned by the White House as a possible choice for energy secretary.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- EPA cites risks from air toxics in urban areas, improvements
- Scientists hope tiny robotic bee’s big dreams take flight
- Law broken in Bergdahl hostage deal, GAO finds
- $1T cost to sustain fighter jet in cross hairs
- Don’t eat tuna, Consumer Reports tells mothers-to-be
- Mortgage deal isn’t likely to cost $17B
- $132.5M ransom asked for Foley
- States can apply for more time before using student scores to evaluate teachers
- California attorney general to appeal ruling on death penalty
- GPS stations show drought-stricken California — not pushed downward by 63 trillion gallons of water — is rising
- Assad’s chemical weapons stockpile destroyed, U.S. declares