Soldier's double-arm transplant a success
The nation's first soldier to survive losing all four limbs in the Iraq war has received a double-arm transplant in Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, the hospital is expected to announce on Tuesday.
Brendan Marrocco, 26, of Staten Island, N.Y., who underwent the marathon surgery last month, was the first service member from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to survive the loss of four limbs, officials have said.
He lost both legs above the knee, his left arm below the elbow and his right arm above the elbow when the military vehicle he was driving was struck by a roadside bomb on April 12, 2009.
He is the nation's first service member to receive a double-arm transplant, and the hospital says he is one of only seven people in the United States who have undergone successful double arm transplants.
The complex operation was performed on Dec. 18.
Later, in a new anti-rejection procedure, he received an infusion of bone marrow, derived from vertebrae harvested from the donor's lower spine. The infusion allows doctors to reduce the number of powerful anti-rejection drugs used from three to one.
That is beneficial because the anti-rejection drugs can have harmful side effects, including infection, organ damage and cancer.
The 13-hour surgery was performed by a special team of transplant experts headed by W.P. Andrew Lee, professor and chairman of the department of plastic and reconstructive surgery at the hospital.
It was the first limb transplant by his newly established group at Hopkins, the hospital said.
“He's doing well,” Marrocco's father, Alex, said Monday. “Doing well. It's been a little over a month now.”
The hospital said it would detail the operation at a news briefing on Tuesday.
The procedure was the seventh double-hand or double-arm transplant performed in the United States. Lee led three of those earlier operations when he worked at the University of Pittsburgh, including the only above-elbow transplant that had been done at the time, in 2010.
Little thus far is publicly known about Marrocco's donor, but Lee said the donor arms often are brought from another hospital, another city or another state.
Donor and recipient do not necessarily have to be of the same gender, but the limbs should match in size, skin color, and tissue and blood type.
Details are critical
In a double transplant, all four arms must be carefully readied, with the skin peeled back and the bone ends cut at angle, as a good carpenter might, for a solid connection, according to a textbook on transplantation Lee and his colleagues are writing.
Inside the arm, individual muscle tendon units, nerves and blood vessels are identified. They are then tagged with pieces of light blue sterile bandages that are sewn in place and labeled in permanent black marker to ensure proper connection.
The connecting sequence begins with the bones, which are joined with metal plates.
“It's not as easy as fixing a fracture,” Lee said, “because the two ends of the bone belong to different people.”
Next, he said, “we typically connect the muscles and tendons.”
After that, “we put together the blood vessels,” he said. “That's the critical part, where we need to restore circulation to the transplanted limb by connecting the arteries and the veins. And they're typically done under a microscope.”
Finally, the skin is sewn together.
Lee said war injuries have often resulted in amputations higher up the arm.
That is more problematic, in part, because nerves in the donor arm are dead and must be replaced by the recipient's nerves, which regenerate down the arm at a rate of about an inch a month.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Drownings in Rio Grande spike as enforcement surges
- Despite high gas costs, Northeast resistant to pipelines
- 2 bodies found at site of gas explosion in NYC apartments
- Global warming is slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences
- Boston police officer improving after surgery to remove bullet near ear
- Gun used by agent who helped jail Capone headed to museum
- Pence: ‘Not going to change’ religious freedom law
- Doctors push end-of-life care talks
- Before leak, NSA mulled ending phone program
- Mining for tourists? A dubious economic savior in Appalachia
- Run from Cuba, Americans cling to claims for seized property