Senators outline paths for illegals
WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of eight prominent senators on Monday laid out an ambitious overhaul of the nation's patchwork immigration system that would balance tougher border enforcement with establishing a path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants and new opportunities for seasonal farm workers to gain legal status.
The senators acknowledged pitfalls that have doomed such efforts in the past, but they suggested that November's elections — with Hispanics voting heavily for President Obama and other Democrats — could make this time different.
“Other bipartisan groups of senators have stood in the same spot before, trumpeting similar proposals,” said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. “But we believe this will be the year Congress finally gets it done. The politics on this issue have been turned upside down,” Schumer said.
“Elections. Elections,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. “The Republican Party is losing the support of our Hispanic citizens.”
Obama got 71 percent of the Latino vote in November compared with 27 percent for Republican Mitt Romney.
The star of the senators' group may have been Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, a charismatic Cuban-American who has tied his political fortunes and a potential 2016 White House run to his dramatic life story as the son of political refugees from Fidel Castro.
“I am clearly new to this issue in terms of the Senate,” the first-term senator told reporters during a Capitol Hill news conference. “I'm not new in terms of my life. I live surrounded by immigrants. My neighbors are immigrants. I married into a family of immigrants. I see immigration every single day. I see the good of immigration. I see how important it is for our future.”
Besides the citizenship provision, including new qualifications, the Senate measure would crack down on employers who hire illegal immigrants. The plans are still short on detail, and all the senators conceded that months of tedious and politically treacherous negotiations lie ahead, but they hope to propel far-reaching immigration legislation through the Senate by summer.
The bipartisan group, which includes Democrats Dick Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado and Republicans Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Jeff Flake of Arizona, beat Obama to the punch by a day. The president will outline his own proposal in Nevada, a state with growing numbers of Latinos, on Tuesday.
“It says quite a bit about our nation, about how many people want to come here in this free country with this opportunity for an expanding economy,” Durbin said. “They want to be here in America. But let's be honest about it. ... Our immigration system is broken. It has been broken for a long time.”
President George W. Bush, McCain, Graham and the late Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts led the last major push to pass an immigration overhaul, but it failed in June 2007 after a bitter fight that tied up the Senate for weeks.
The new bipartisan overhaul plan would allow illegal immigrants to obtain a green card only after fulfilling a number of requirements: registering with the government; passing a criminal background check; settling back taxes; and paying a fine for having entered the United States improperly.
If they met the first standards, undocumented immigrants would get in line behind green card applicants pursuing legal residency. They would then have to learn English and U.S. civics, show a record of employment and pass another background check.
The plan has a significant element that was not part of the 2007 initiative: undocumented farm workers who “have been performing very important and difficult work to maintain America's food supply while earning subsistence wages” could earn a path to citizenship through a different and presumably more lenient visa process for agricultural workers.
And the new package would enact most of the long-stalled DREAM Act by providing less onerous requirements for the children of illegal immigrants.
Obama last year enacted parts of the DREAM Act via executive orders, offering deferments on deportation to young adult immigrants and angering Republicans who viewed the measures as political maneuvers aimed at drawing Hispanic voters.
The senators' plan would beef up enforcement with more border agents, increased use of drones and completion of an entry-exit system to track visa holders better. And it would set up a commission of governors, attorneys general and community leaders from border states.
White House press secretary Jay Carney said the senators' proposal contains “principles that mirror the president's blueprint.”
In another sign of potential bipartisan progress, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky each responded positively to the bipartisan plan from their colleagues.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers were among the business groups lining up behind the plan.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court will hear challenge to EPA’s power-plant rules
- Brown family blasts prosecutor; Wilson speaks
- Protest in Cleveland over 12-year-old’s shooting death chokes off traffic
- Illegals protected by Obama in line for Social Security, Medicare, other benefits
- Mo. governor adds guardsmen as protests continue
- United Mine Workers responds to strike complaint
- Alcohol’s role in collegiate assaults cited at University of Virginia board’s meeting
- Ferguson grand jury focused on fatal ‘tussle’
- Premiums to rise for Obamacare’s most popular plans
- In IRS ‘rife with scandal,’ staff to receive bonuses
- Oregon recounts votes on measure to label GMO foods