Border arrests up slightly in past year
WASHINGTON — A year after Border Patrol apprehensions of illegal border crossers plunged to the lowest levels in 40 years, agents have had a slight increase in arrests, according to data obtained by The Associated Press.
In the budget year that ended in September, Border Patrol agents arrested 356,873 would-be border crossers along the Mexican border. In fiscal year 2011, agents along the Mexican border made 327,577 arrests.
According to the arrest statistics, agents in three Border Patrol sectors in Texas and the Yuma, Ariz., sector made more arrests in the last year. Arrests in other sectors were down compared to a year ago.
Customs and Border Protection said in a statement that apprehensions remain at “historic lows” and pointed to continued decreases in arrests in California, New Mexico and most of Arizona as evidence that fewer people are crossing the border illegally.
In the Rio Grande Valley, illegal border crossers from countries other than Mexico made up the majority of the increase in arrests, the Border Patrol has said previously. Most of those people made their way to the border from Central American countries including Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras.
That portion of the Texas-Mexico border is the shortest distance from Central America.
The numbers of Guatemalans passing through the area increased so much that the country opened a consulate in McAllen, Texas. Guatemala's consul there, Alba Caceres, said that Honduras or El Salvador might share their office space this year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Few knew of cyber attack on White House computer network
- Nurse defies Maine quarantine in standoff over Ebola
- Botched probe of suspected arms dealer echoed Fast and Furious, watchdog finds
- Gray wolf sighting reported at Grand Canyon
- Hawaii’s National Guard sent to lava flow site
- Wash. shooting survivor has jaw surgery
- Unaccompanied immigrants put heavy strain on schools, charities
- D.C. closer to legalizing sale of pot
- Museum saves part of bomber plant
- Terminally ill woman may delay planned Nov. 1 suicide
- Ferguson grand jury cleared in leaks about police shooting of black teenager