Hagel's allies say he'll woo critics at hearing today
By USA Today
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2013, 7:42 p.m.
WASHINGTON — After weeks of hearing from critics that Defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel is not tough enough on Iran, not tight enough with Israel and too eager to dismantle the nation's nuclear arsenal, Hagel's allies say he will dispel those concerns during his hearing on Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee.
“Chuck's not soft on anybody,” said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., a committee member.
Interest groups have taken out millions of dollars in ads blasting Hagel. The top Republican on the committee, Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, penned an op-ed in The Washington Post on Sunday saying Hagel's stands disqualify him for the office.
Another committee member, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said this week he would block Hagel's nomination until Defense Secretary Leon Panetta testifies on the military's response to the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans.
Hagel, in written comments to the committee, called Israel a “key security partner of the United States.” Regarding Iran, he wrote that he backs President Obama's position that military options will be considered to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
“With the ever-present threat of Iran, the next secretary of Defense must be vigilant in pursuing the goal of preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and must maintain our unshakable commitment to Israel's security,” Hagel wrote.
Countering terrorism and threats in cyberspace will be among his top priorities, he said.
Hagel is working in an office in the Pentagon to prepare for what Obama and his administration expect will be a successful confirmation process. One key Republican, Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, has said he will vote for Hagel, a former two-term Republican senator from Nebraska. Cochran is the ranking Republican on the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee, which determines military spending.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sandy Hook 911 calls fuel sensitivity debate
- Alzheimer’s patient’s slaying tests ‘stand your ground’ self-defense law in Georgia
- Study links cholesterol, breast cancer
- Congressmen seek medal for World War II spies
- Montana asks court to toss teacher’s light term for rape of girl
- ‘Singin’ in the Rain’ suit headed for block
- Supreme Court declines Web taxation case
- Young Americans sour on Obama
- Don’t give up on health care law, Obama urges young activists
- Wash. woman tweets of crash death, finds out it’s husband
- Bratton returns to lead New York City police force