Bachmann leading target of Dem super PAC
The leading super PAC that helps elect House Democrats says it will target Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann and nine other Republicans for defeat in the 2014 elections.
The House Majority PAC, which spent about $36 million on campaigns last year, said each GOP target is in a competitive district and “has an out-of-touch, extreme record.”
“In 2012, House Majority PAC built a strong record of success and in 2013 we are ready to hit the ground running to hold these Republicans accountable and communicate with swing voters about their extreme records and backwards priorities,” said Alixandria Lapp, the PAC's executive director.
Bachmann, the founder of the House Tea Party Caucus who ran for president last year, stands out because she narrowly won re-election in Minnesota. She defeated Democrat Jim Graves by a little more than 1 percentage point in the House's most-expensive race last year. Bachmann spent more than $22 million vs. about $2.2 million spent by Graves, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Besides Bachmann, the House Majority PAC is aiming at Republicans Mike Coffman of Colrado, Gary Miller of California, Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mike Fitzpatrick of Bucks County, Michael Grimm of New York, Joe Heck of Nevada, David Joyce of Ohio, John Kline of Minnesota and Steve Southerland of Florida. Democrats need a net gain of 17 seats to win the House majority next year. Midterm elections, however, are typically challenging for a president's party. In 2010, President Obama said his Democrats took a “shellacking” when Republicans won 63 House seats.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.