30-vehicle pileup in Ind. injures 10; elephants OK
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013, 9:20 p.m.
PLAINFIELD, Ind. — A more than 30-vehicle pileup on a snowy Indiana interstate left at least 10 people injured on Thursday, including at least one critically, and shut down a heavily traveled highway for most of the evening, authorities said.
Most of the injuries in the afternoon pileup along Interstate 70 were minor, but one victim's condition was “very critical,” Indiana State Police Sgt. Rich Myers said.
Semitrailers sat smashed side-by-side against one another along the stretch about 20 miles west of Indianapolis, with cars and other smaller vehicles pushed to the sides of the roadway. About 20 big rigs and about 15 passenger vehicles were involved in the pileup, state police Capt. Dave Bursten said.
Several motorists blinded by a snow squall crashed into stalled traffic on the slick road, police said.
“We believe weather was a factor,” Bursten said. Snow was falling at the time of the crash, and whiteout conditions were possible, along with slick roads, according to the National Weather Service.
The main crash happened at the interstate's 65-mile marker, but there was a second crash involving at least two jackknifed semitrailer rigs nearby, Indiana Department of Transportation spokeswoman Debbie Calder said.
At one point, three elephants had to be off-loaded from a vehicle involved in the pileup until the vehicle was righted on the highway, then reloaded for the resumption of their journey, Bursten said. He had no other details on the pachyderms.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Traffic tickets — and revenue — plunge in Dallas
- Monitor ends bid to force chemo on Ohio girl
- Measure happiness, U.S. told
- Beer black market exploits enthusiasts, ignores law
- Utah doctor’s suicide attempt foiled by jail staff
- Ex-prof hopes to save art for Detroit
- Earnings vary wildly by major, team says
- Baker ordered to serve gay couples
- FBI: Russian diplomats lied to get U.S. benefits
- From prison to presidency, Mandela reformed South Africa, ended apartheid
- Sandy Hook 911 calls fuel sensitivity debate