Arkansas would ban abortions as early as 6 weeks
LITTLE ROCK — The Arkansas Senate voted on Thursday to prohibit most abortions if a heartbeat is detected, ignoring warnings from opponents that banning the procedure as early as six weeks into a pregnancy would invite lawsuits.
If enacted, the ban would be the most stringent in the nation. The Ohio House passed a similar ban in 2011, but it was sidelined in the Senate last year over concerns that it might be found unconstitutional.
Arkansas' Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe told reporters on Thursday that's the same concern that he's researching.
“I'm waiting on lawyers. I think that's the big concern right now — does it run afoul of the Supreme Court or constitutional restrictions?” Beebe said. “That's the first thing we're looking at.”
The Senate approved the new ban on the same day that a House committee advanced two other abortion restrictions, part of a package of legislation anti-abortion groups believe are poised to become law now that Republicans control the state General Assembly.
The Senate approved the proposed Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Act in a 26-8 vote. The measure, which now heads to a House committee, requires a test to detect a fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed. If one is detected, a woman could not have an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest and if a mother's life is in danger.
Similar legislation is also being considered in North Dakota and Mississippi. All have faced complaints from abortion rights groups that it runs afoul of the U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion up until viability, usually at 22 to 24 weeks.
“I'm asking you to stand up for life, and I believe when there is a heartbeat, based upon even the standard the Supreme Court has utilized, you cannot have a viable child without a heartbeat,” Sen. Jason Rapert, the bill's sponsor, told lawmakers before they approved the legislation.
Five Democrats joined all 21 of the Senate's Republicans to vote for the restriction. Two Democratic lawmakers who spoke out against the bill said they believe it would be an invasion of women's rights to make decisions about their health if the state enacts the ban.
“I don't want to go back to when women used kerosene and clothes hangers because they didn't have a choice,” Sen. Linda Chesterfield, D-Little Rock, told lawmakers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Mountaineer workers fear smoking ban will harm ‘livelihood’
- HGH use on the rise in teens, survey finds
- To fight crime, Chicago tries wiping away arrests
- U.S. intel believes civilian plane might have been mistaken for Ukraine military aircraft
- Man convicted of enslaving woman gets 30 years
- For more than 8 decades, N.Y. farmer has kept eye to the sky
- Cyber domain is next battleground, authors of 9/11 report warn
- VA nominee to demand ‘urgent action,’ he tells panel
- 100 years later, World War I resonates at Kansas City museum
- Explosion levels home in Central Texas; 3 hurt
- Montana judge censured over rape case comments