Share This Page

W.Va. coal dust standards not enforced, samples show

| Sunday, Feb. 3, 2013, 9:08 p.m.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Regulators are not enforcing state standards aimed at reducing buildups of explosive coal dust in underground mines.

More than a fifth of the more than 5,500 dust samples taken from mines by state regulators since August 2011 did not comply with the standards. The state Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training has not issued any citations, The Charleston Gazette reported.

“We have not cited any of these samples as of this date,” Eugene White, the state's new mine safety director, told the newspaper. “This is still a work in progress. We're working on it.”

“We learned a lesson at Upper Big Branch,” White said. “In my opinion, the mines are white today,” referring to a layer of rock-dust being visible on top of black coal dust underground.

Mine safety advocate Davitt McAteer said the standards don't mean anything if there are no consequences for failing to comply.

“It's a charade,” said McAteer, who led an independent team appointed by then-Gov. Joe Manchin to investigate the 2010 explosion that killed 29 workers at the Upper Big Branch Mine. “This dust issue was absolutely the most critical failure at the Upper Big Branch Mine and three years later, there's still not a prevention measure in place to keep it from occurring again.”

Dennis O'Dell, safety director for the United Mine Workers, said the state “has been dragging its feet too long.”

“Someone needs to move forward with this,” O'Dell said.

The standards require mine operators to use more inert crushed rock, a practice known as rock dusting, to control the buildup of coal dust. Manchin mandated the standards in an executive order issued nine days after the Upper Big Branch explosion, which was the worst U.S. coal mine disaster in four decades. They later were included in mine safety legislation passed by the Legislature.

Chris Hamilton, vice president for the West Virginia Coal Association, said the industry is doing more rock dusting than ever.

“The industry has learned some things over the past couple of years. It's just one of those areas where the industry has returned back to basics,” Hamilton said.

In September, the agency withdrew a rule that focused on rock dusting. The decision followed a letter from a Coal Mine Health and Safety Board member raising concerns about the provisions. Agency lawyer Jack Rife said state officials want the rule to be in place before enforcement actions are taken.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.