Archbishop's letter on sex abuse read in Los Angeles churches
By The Associated Press
Published: Sunday, Feb. 3, 2013, 9:22 p.m.
LOS ANGELES — Roman Catholic parishioners in the Los Angeles area heard a letter from Archbishop Jose Gomez in which he described newly released files on clergy sex abuse as “terribly sad and evil.”
Church leaders read the archbishop's words at Sunday Mass across the Los Angeles Archdiocese, which extends into Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, the Los Angeles Times reported. The letter, addressed to “My brothers and sisters in Christ,” was made public last week.
Gomez said the church needs to acknowledge the “terrible failure” of its handling of abuse cases.
At St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church in North Hollywood, parishioner Eric Nielsen praised Gomez for addressing the issue in such a prominent way.
“I take my hat off to the archbishop,” said Nielsen, 52. “He got on the ball and did what needed to be done.”
Nielsen said he probably would stop attending the church, where he has worshipped since 1981, because he was upset by the scandal.
“It's a shame,” he said.
On Thursday, Gomez stripped his predecessor Cardinal Roger Mahony of his administrative duties for failing to take swift action against abusive priests.
Gomez's rebuke and Mahony's public response were unprecedented because they revealed infighting between two highly placed church leaders in a Roman Catholic hierarchy that rarely break ranks publicly.
In his letter, Gomez described the latest records to be made public as “brutal and painful reading.”
“The behavior described in these files is terribly sad and evil,” Gomez wrote. “There is no excuse, no explaining away what happened to these children. The priests involved had the duty to be their spiritual fathers and they failed.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tenn. homicide suspect shot mom in 2004
- Holocaust survivor sues Germany in looted art claim
- ‘Senior officers should not do that,’ Army leader says in pleading guilty to misconduct charges
- Gillibrand sex assault bill halted by fellow Democrat
- Former National Security Agency contractor Snowden’s leaks to cost billions, take years to fix
- 18-year-old loses suit seeking parents’ support
- House foils Obama’s new power plant limits on carbon pollution
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Crisis stymies Obama getaway
- Lawmakers vote to bar ‘upskirt’ photos in Massachusetts