Brakes key concern in deadly Calif. crash
By The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013, 8:24 p.m.
YUCAIPA, Calif. — Federal and state investigators searched on Tuesday in the mangled wreckage of a California tour bus for the cause of a weekend crash that left seven people dead and injured dozens of others.
Authorities targeted the brakes and other equipment for clues about why the driver lost control on a two-lane mountain highway in the San Bernardino Mountains on the way back to Tijuana, Mexico, after a trip to the snow.
The roadworthiness of the 1996 bus loomed as a key issue because the driver told investigators that the brakes failed as he descended from the popular Big Bear ski area. Federal records pointed to a history of brake-maintenance problems with the European-made bus.
“We are going to look very closely at the brakes, as we will every other mechanical system on the bus,” National Transportation Safety Board spokesman Eric Weiss said.
Opening a review that could take months, investigators for the California Highway Patrol and NTSB began collecting evidence on the bus, road conditions and possible driver error or fatigue that could have played a role in the crash.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hearing to determine fate of sergeant accused of killing 2 deaf Iraqi youths
- Precautions lack year since fatal blast at plant
- Mo. mayor steps down over anti-Semitic comments
- Senator pitches gasoline tax increase
- Foundation gives $13M to promote Obamacare
- Little toxicity data exists for tainted W.Va. water
- Moscow to get serious ‘message’ from U.S.
- Images best of readied D-Day ships
- Justices uphold Michigan ban on affirmative action, giving states room to maneuver
- Justices critical of Ohio law punishing campaign lies
- Details about USS Cole suspect’s stint in CIA custody must be turned over