NRA chief: Congress won't pass any restrictive measures
DENVER — The National Rifle Association's president said Thursday that he's confident that Congress won't approve an assault-weapons ban or a limit on high-capacity ammunition magazines in response to mass shootings in Colorado and Connecticut last year.
David Keene predicted failure for all congressional measures related to guns, including expanded background checks for purchases.
“I tell you what these things are. These are all feel-good proposals, because at the end of the day, what do they do to prevent” a mass shooter? asked Keene.
Keene was in Denver to talk to Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, and state lawmakers. He met with The Associated Press for an interview before sitting down with state officials. He talked about prospects for federal gun-control measures under discussion in Congress and predicted political peril for Democrats who support such bills.
“The Senate's where the action's going to be,” Keene said. “The House is sort of sitting back, and you can almost hear the House Republican leadership saying under their breath: ‘You know, go ahead. We've got a few members that wouldn't mind sitting in the Senate. If you do this, maybe they will.' So the Senate leadership is much more cautious.”
Sen. Mark Udall, a Democrat representing Colorado, said he disagrees with Keene's assertion that Congress won't do anything.
“In the wake of recent mass shootings, including one in Colorado, the status quo on gun violence is simply unacceptable,” Udall said. “Coloradans expect and deserve better than continued inaction from Congress. I simply disagree that Congress cannot or should not try to reduce mass shootings and gun violence.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Petraeus, Justice Department reach plea deal on secret info given to mistress
- Physicians’ organization cites shortages of doctors will grow, mostly in senior care
- GOP admits defeat as Congress approves Homeland funding
- States ask judge not to lift stay in immigration lawsuit
- Obama promises to veto Republican vote to reverse NLRB rule on unions
- Railroad measure awaits House approval
- Oil spill in Washington river endangers wildlife
- Expanded background checks pushed again on gun show, Internet purchases
- FDA orders warning on testosterone pills
- Case on Obamacare tax subsidies heads to Supreme Court
- Feds find sweeping racial bias in Ferguson