Bush family's emails hacked by 'Guccifer'
HOUSTON — Members of the Bush family, including both former presidents, have apparently been hacked, and the Secret Service is investigating.
Bush family photos and excerpts of emails were posted online on Thursday by the Smoking Gun, which attributed them to a hacker known as “Guccifer.” Guccifer claimed to be a veteran hacker being sought by “the feds.” “This is just another chapter in the game,” he wrote.
The website reported that at least six email accounts had been hacked, including the AOL account of Dorothy Bush Koch, sister of George W. Bush, as well as former first lady Barbara Bush's brother and the elder Bush's sister-in-law.
The hacked emails, sent between 2009 and 2012, apparently contained security codes and a list of addresses and cellphone numbers.
The leaked photos included private moments: a snapshot of George H.W. Bush that appeared to have been taken during his recent stay in a Houston hospital, George W. Bush posing with a cardboard cutout of himself.
In leaked emails, the elder Bush's hospitalization prompted relatives to discuss funeral arrangements. The Smoking Gun reported that, “The former president's chief of staff wrote his children to inform them that ‘your dad's funeral team is having an emergency meeting at 10 a.m. just to go through all the details.' The Bush aide, Jean Becker, noted that this information ‘fell under the broadening category of things NOT TO TELL YOUR MOTHER.' ”
The Smoking Gun also reported that George W. Bush wrote he was “thinking about eulogy” and “solicited stories that best illustrated their father's sweet nature, favorite jokes, and acts of kindness. ‘Hopefully I'm jumping the gun,' noted Bush.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.