Plea deal for Jesse Jackson Jr. reportedly will include jail time
Former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Ill., reached a plea agreement with prosecutors in the investigation into his alleged misuse of tens of thousands of dollars in campaign funds, according to Chicago news organizations on Friday.
“Significant jail time is now definitely a part of the deal,” an unnamed source close to the probe told the Chicago Sun Times this week.
Violations include using campaign funds for a $40,000 Rolex watch, travel expenses for a friend and furniture purchased for his Washington home, NBC News reported.
Justice Department officials would not confirm publicly whether any agreement with Jackson had been reached. A federal official with knowledge of the case told USA Today that plea discussions were taking place but indicated that nothing was final.
Jackson, the 47-year-old namesake of the civil rights leader, resigned in November, shortly after being reelected to a ninth term in the House. For months before his resignation, he was absent from Congress as he dealt with mental health problems that twice landed him in the Mayo Clinic.
The probe of Jackson has reportedly evolved into two separate investigations, with authorities taking an independent look at Jackson's wife, Sandi Jackson, who recently resigned as a Chicago city alderman.
“I think Sandi feels like she was thrown under the bus by her husband,” a second source told the Sun Times this week.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.