TribLIVE

| USWorld

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Lawmakers to consider special court to approve use of drones in 'kill' attacks

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By The Associated Press
Friday, Feb. 8, 2013, 8:30 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — Lawmakers are considering whether Congress should set up a special court to decide when drones can kill American al-Qaida suspects overseas, much as a secret court now grants permission for surveillance. The effort, after CIA Director-designate John Brennan's vigorous defense of a drone attack that killed U.S. citizens, reflects a philosophical struggle in government over remote warfare.

The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Dianne Feinstein of California, spelled it out at the start of Brennan's confirmation hearing on Thursday. She declared that she intended to review proposals for “legislation to ensure that drone strikes are carried out in a manner consistent with our values and the proposal to create an analogue of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to review the conduct of such strikes.”

And Sen. Angus King Jr., in a letter Friday to senior leaders of the panel, suggested an “independent process — similar to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court — to provide an appropriate check on the executive branch's procedure for determining whether using lethal force in a foreign country against a U.S. citizen would be lawful.”

In FISA proceedings, 11 federal judges review wiretap applications that enable the FBI and other agencies to gather evidence to build cases. Suspects have no lawyers present, as they would in other U.S. courts, and the proceedings are secret. The government presents its case to a judge, who issues a warrant or not.

The notion of something similar for drone strikes drew immediate criticism from human rights and legal groups, which contend that such a court must allow the accused to mount a defense.

“It's not about evidence gathering, it's about punishment to the point of execution,” said Mary Ellen O'Connell, professor of international law at the University of Notre Dame and a critic of the government's drone program. “We have never thought people could be executed without some kind of trial.”

A former CIA official reacted coolly, too, but from the opposite direction.

“I think it is reasonable to ask the question under what circumstances the president can use lethal force against a U.S. citizen overseas,” said Jeff Smith, former general counsel of the CIA. “It's a frightening power, and I think we need to think very, very carefully about how that power is used and whether some judicial review is warranted.”

“But I certainly don't think judicial review or congressional review is needed to strike al-Qaida or other terrorist organizations,” he said.

The idea is also so preliminary that lawmakers can't yet say exactly how a new process would work. Most of those interviewed said the current system works well.

Brennan pioneered the current process to determine which targets are dangerous enough to be placed on one of two hit lists for killing or capture — one held by the CIA and the other by the military's Joint Special Operations Command. Many of the names on the lists overlap, and the agency that goes after the target depends on where the suspect appears.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Dusty Atlantic Ocean thwarts tropical storms
  2. Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
  3. Planned Parenthood recordings release halted by judge
  4. Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
  5. Amid 4-year drought, fears rise of trees dying, falling in California
  6. Baltimore slayings climb to level unseen in decades
  7. Fires’ fury unabated in California
  8. Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
  9. Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
  10. Global lion population falling primarily because of loss of habitat, experts say
  11. Feds eye use of federal dollars for ads for for-profit colleges