TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Last federal government 'cuts' were mostly gimmicks

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Washington Post
Saturday, Feb. 9, 2013, 9:30 p.m.
 

Late on the night of April 8, 2011, Washington's leaders announced they had just done something extraordinary. They had agreed to cut the federal budget — and cut it big.

“The largest annual spending cut in our history,” President Obama called it in a televised speech.

To prevent a government shutdown, the parties had agreed to slash $37.8 billion: more than the budgets of the Labor and Commerce departments combined.

At the Capitol, Republicans savored a win for austerity. There would be “deep, but responsible, reductions in virtually all areas of government,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., promised a few days later, before the deal passed.

Nearly two years later, however, these landmark budget cuts have fallen far short of their promises.

In some areas, they did bring significant cutbacks in federal spending. Grants for clean water dried up. Cities got less money for affordable housing.

But the bill also turned out to be an epic kind of Washington illusion. It was stuffed with gimmicks that made the cuts seem far bigger — and the politicians far bolder — than they actually were.

In the real world, in fact, many of their “cuts” cut nothing at all. The Transportation Department got credit for “cutting” a $280 million tunnel that had been canceled six months earlier. It also “cut” a $375,000 road project that had been created by a legislative typo, on a road that did not exist.

At the Census Bureau, officials also got credit for a whopping $6 billion cut, simply for obeying the calendar. They promised not to hold the expensive 2010 census again in 2011.

Today an examination of 12 of the largest cuts shows that, thanks in part to these gimmicks, federal agencies absorbed $23 billion in reductions without losing a single employee.

“Many of the cuts we put in were smoke and mirrors,” said Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., a hard-line conservative now in his second term. “That's the lesson from April 2011: that when Washington says it cuts spending, it doesn't mean the same thing that normal people mean.”

Now the failures of that 2011 bill have come back to haunt the leaders who crafted it. Disillusionment with that bill has persuaded many conservatives to reject a line-by-line, program-by-program approach to cutting the budget.

Instead, many have embraced the sequester, a looming $85 billion across-the-board cut set to take effect March 1. Obama and GOP leaders have said they don't like the idea: The sequester is a “dumb cut,” in Washington parlance, that would cut the government's best ideas along with its worst without regard to merit.

But at least, conservatives say, you can trust that this one is for real.

“There has been a shift in resolve. They have been burned in these fictional cuts. And so the sequester is like real cuts,” said Chris Chocola, a former congressman who now heads the Club for Growth, a conservative advocacy group. “So I think that there is a willingness to say, ‘We've really got to cut stuff, and [the cuts] have got to be real.'”

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
  2. Senator Paul plots ways to draw minorities to GOP
  3. Carjacked SUV hits crowd in Philadelphia, killing 3 siblings
  4. Sheriff doubles to 300 estimate of homes wracked by fire in Washington
  5. Data on impact of Colo. gun law, background checks questioned
  6. Russia stacking troops at border, U.S. claims
  7. Radar captures mayfly swarm on Mississippi
  8. New Jersey siblings split $20M lottery prize
  9. Court upholds Fla.’s ‘Docs vs. Glocks’
  10. Judge: Feds wrong to list bearded seals
  11. Pope to visit Philly next year
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.