1 dead, 7 hurt in firebombing of Detroit home
DETROIT — Arson and homicide investigators are probing the firebombing on Sunday of a Detroit family's home in which one person died and three were critically hurt.
Eight of the nine people inside were injured, police told the Detroit Free Press.
No arrests or suspects were immediately reported.
Detroit police referred an Associated Press request for details to a fire official, who said he did not have any information on the death or seriousness of injuries of those in the house.
Firefighters got a call at 6:10 a.m. Sunday to respond to a house on the city's near east side, said Senior Chief Scott Tederington. He said he knew of five people taken to hospitals. No firefighters were reported injured, he said.
Two people were treated at the scene, and six were hospitalized, police Cmdr. Steve Dolunt told Detroit media outlets. He said three were in critical condition and three were in serious condition.
“It's pretty bad, but it could have been a lot worse,” Dolunt said.
Witnesses said they saw two men drive up to the house and throw a firebomb through the front window, Dolunt said. He said it was the private home of a large family ranging from 29 to 60.
Kita Thomas, 32, said she woke up early Sunday to the sound of crackling and popping, and saw fire coming from her neighbor's home.
“I ran outside with no shoes or socks, and banged on the doors and windows, trying to wake everybody up,” Thomas, a nursing assistant, told The Detroit News.
Thomas said a man and woman were on the second-floor back porch and told her they couldn't go back in the house because it was too smoky.
She said the couple threw a key down to her, and she and another neighbor tried unsuccessfully to open the doors just as firefighters arrived.
“It was just chaotic, but the firefighters did a good job this morning, they took care of business,” Thomas said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- Appeals court upholds nation of origin labels for meat
- Surgeon general echoes warnings about skin cancer
- Met Museum of Art president to retire
- Move over, Mickey, here comes Crayola
- U.S. coal exports undermine clean air efforts, experts say
- Swift action expected of VA’s new secretary
- UCLA inundated by burst pipe
- Cellphone users can soon declare freedom from wireless carriers
- Obama’s many rules often violate statute
- Highway funding overhaul sought