TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Report faults FAA for small airlines' risks

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013, 6:09 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — Since a deadly airline crash in 2009, the government has not kept its promise to ensure that major airlines are holding their smaller partners to the same safety standards, a federal watchdog says.

The Transportation Department's inspector general faults the Federal Aviation Administration for not taking steps to encourage the big airlines “to consistently share safety information and best practices” with regional airlines that operate flights under contract for them.

That business link is known as code-sharing, by which one airline sells tickets for seats on a flight operated by another airline — United and United Express, for example.

More than half of all airline flights in the United States are operated by regional airlines using names such as United Express, Delta Connection, American Connection and US Airways Express under code-sharing arrangements.

A flight operated by regional carrier Colgan Air for Continental Airlines under the name Continental Express crashed in February 2009 near Buffalo, killing 50 people. After that crash, officials at the department and the FAA said they would begin reviewing code-share contracts to see if they impinged on safety.

Investigators cited pilot training lapses by Colgan as a factor. Colgan ended flying in September as part of its parent company's restructuring.

A National Transportation Safety Board investigation and congressional hearings after the Colgan crash pointed out the differences in safety cultures that sometimes occur between the two types of airlines.

For example, at that time, some regional carriers were hiring pilots with as few as 250 hours of flight experience, which FAA rules allow. Major airlines typically hired pilots with about 10 times that much experience.

After the crash, pilot unions and safety advocates said regional carriers were driven to cut corners on safety, including hiring inexperienced pilots at low wages, in part to meet performance goals required under the code-sharing contracts. Airlines that met their goals often earned more money under the agreements, while those that failed to meet such goals were sometimes penalized.

The FAA, despite earlier promises, is not reviewing any code-share contracts for their safety implications, and the Transportation Department reviews only a small share for their potential economic impact, not safety, the report stated.

“As a result, most domestic code-share agreements go into effect without being reviewed by any (federal) regulatory entity,” the report stated.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Officers swarm California counties as deputies killed in shooting rampage
  2. Teacher tried to stop school shooting
  3. Teacher tried to stop Washington state shooting
  4. 3 Supreme Court justices offer Yale students an insider’s look at personalities
  5. Anti-abortion group tries to sway votes of women in Democratic households
  6. Philadelphia Mafia figure returned to prison for meeting friend
  7. WWII pilot takes off in B-29 yet again
  8. 1686 shipwreck ‘like dinosaur’ being rebuilt for museum
  9. Seattle area school homecoming ‘prince’ guns down classmates
  10. U.S. rules out apology to Pyongyang in exchange for 2 imprisoned Americans
  11. New York, New Jersey order 21-day quarantine of all in contact with Ebola virus
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.