Laser system may one day zap asteroids
Scientists and engineers are looking for ways to head off close calls with asteroids well before they're in a position to do us any harm.
Two California scientists have a new proposal to deploy an array of lasers that could vaporize asteroids from as far away as 93 million miles — the distance between Earth and the sun. Working in synchrony, the lasers could destroy a menacing asteroid outright or at least knock it off course. They call their device Directed Energy Solar Targeting of Asteroids and exploRation, or DE-STAR for short.
“You don't blow up an asteroid like the Death Star in ‘Star Wars,' where you push a button and the planet explodes. You basically take a blowtorch to it in the form of a laser beam, and you begin to evaporate it,” said Philip Lubin, a cosmologist at the University of California at Santa Barbara who's behind the proposal.
“It takes about a few months to evaporate an asteroid the size of a few hundred meters in diameter, which is an asteroid that, if it hit the Earth, would do severe damage. The one that killed the dinosaurs was about 10,000 meters in diameter, or about 6 miles.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar
- U.S., Cuba patching torn relations with historic accord
- $1.5B more a year — from fees tacked onto phone bills — earmarked for faster Internet
- Sale of ‘Breathe Easy’ shirts blasted amid Indiana protests
- Congress’ legacy: Way worse than ‘do-nothing’ one of 1947-48
- Republican lawmakers vow to block confirmation of any potential ambassador to Cuba
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Fracking essentially banned in N.Y.
- Warren’s hangups over trade agenda threaten party ties
- Lifting limits on Cuba a boon for U.S.
- Conn. dentist’s license suspended over death