Cutting salt could save 500,000
Published: Sunday, Feb. 17, 2013, 6:24 p.m.
As many as half a million deaths could be prevented during the next decade if Americans cut their salt intake to within national guidelines, according to a recent study.
That finding, which was made the week New York City announced success toward its goals of cutting salt levels by one-quarter by 2014, is based on computer simulations using data from various studies on the effects of extra sodium on blood pressure and heart risks.
The Institute of Medicine recommends most healthy people get 1,500 milligrams of sodium per day, with an upper limit of 2,300 mg. But the average American eats about 3,600 mg a day, largely through processed food.
“Reducing sodium intake is important for everyone, not just a small subset of people who are salt-sensitive,” study lead author Pamela Coxson said at the University of California, San Francisco.
Although the health effects of cutting back on salt might be small for the average person, she said, the results show they add up when projected across millions of Americans.
Coxson and her colleagues ran three salt-reduction scenarios through models that predicted how a lower-sodium diet would have an impact on a person's risk of having high blood pressure or dying of cardiovascular disease.
The most realistic scenario was a gradual decline in the average sodium intake over ten years to about 2,200 mg per day. That goal would be “optimistic but potentially achievable,” the researchers wrote in the journal Hypertension.
Based on their calculations, and taking into account uncertainties about sodium's direct effect on the heart, Coxson and her colleagues calculated 280,000 to 500,000 fewer Americans would die during the next decade as a result of that reduction.
A more dramatic and immediate decline to 1,500 mg of salt per day across the nation's population could prevent as many as 1.2 million deaths, largely from heart disease or stroke, the researchers said. But that isn't very realistic, policy-wise.
“The gradual reduction is something that many countries around the world are working on in various ways,” Coxson told Reuters Health, noting that some countries have worked with food producers to cut back salt in meat, canned goods and bread.
“The big majority of our intake of sodium is coming from those types of processed foods,” Coxson said. “The individual at home with their salt shakers only controls maybe 20 to 25 percent of their intake.”
But other researchers said the models didn't reflect the full picture of variations in salt intake.
Michael Alderman from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York said the researchers' calculations are missing data on how too little sodium can also raise heart risks, through its effect on blood fats and insulin.
He added that there's no evidence that eating less than 2,000 mg of sodium per day is beneficial for the average person.
“Like every other essential nutrient that I know of, too little is not good for you, and too much is not good for you,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Seafood study: Up to 32 percent imported to U.S. is caught illegally
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- Supreme Court voids overall contribution limits to political candidates
- Feds to require 2-person crews on freight trains hauling crude oil
- Tax Day’s a big deal ... only if you owe Uncle Sam
- Law enforcement dismantles drug trafficking organization linked with smuggling from Mexico across U.S.
- Court upholds EPA emissions restrictions
- 150-plus birds seized at fighting venue in W.Va.
- Wyatt Earp gun sells for $225K at auction
- Records exonerate ‘X-Men’ director, attorney says