Slavery finally, formally abolished in Mississippi
By From Wire Reports
Published: Monday, Feb. 18, 2013, 8:39 p.m.
JACKSON, Miss. — Slavery was abolished only a couple of weeks ago in Mississippi.
Because of a procedural glitch the last time around, Mississippi government formally ratified the 13th Amendment ending slavery.
The amendment was adopted by the United States in 1865. Several states opposed the measure at the time and delayed ratification. Mississippi did not vote to ratify the amendment until 1995.
But, as reported in The Clarion-Ledger, a key step was not taken and the ratification was not made official.
Dr. Ranjan Batra, an associate professor at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, looked into the issue after going to see Steven Spielberg's “Lincoln.” He and a colleague discovered that the state did not officially notify the U.S. archivist in 1995 as required. Batra's colleague called the Mississippi secretary of state, who at last sent the needed paperwork to the National Archives.
The Federal Register wrote back on Feb. 7 to confirm that “with this action, the State of Mississippi has ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- House Republicans signal support for budget deal
- Budget deal reverses $63B in cuts, excludes extension of jobless benefits
- ‘Walking Dead’ actress guilty of sending ricin letters
- Farm bill off for now, but milk prices not expected to spike — yet
- $80M awarded in collision in which N.M. woman suffocated in sand
- Web ‘sextortionist’ jailed on 31 felony counts
- Senate Dems confirm 2 picks
- ‘Soul-crushing’ cold: 135.8 below
- Senate panel vets noncontroversial IRS nominee
- ‘Volcker Rule’ restricts banks in risky investments
- Nevada search has very happy ending