Handgun tax proposed to finance buybacks, safety campaigns
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, 7:42 p.m.
WASHINGTON — A group of Democratic lawmakers, led by Rep. Linda Sanchez of California, is starting an effort to secure money for gun buybacks, firearms safety campaigns and anti-violence programs from a new tax on handgun purchases.
Sanchez introduced the bill, which would impose a 10 percent tax on handgun purchases, on Thursday at Los Angeles County Sheriff's headquarters.
“It is time to give our law enforcement agencies all the necessary resources to prevent gun violence,” Sanchez said.
Gun buyback programs have been popular in cities, with Los Angeles taking in 2,037 firearms, including 75 assault weapons, at a buyback program in December. In New Jersey, more than 1,700 guns were turned in at state-sponsored “no questions asked” gun buybacks held at churches last weekend.
Still, there has been much debate about their effectiveness.
And Sanchez's bill is likely to run into resistance from House Republicans strongly opposed to tax increases.
An NRA spokesman said it strongly opposes “any misguided effort to tax law-abiding Americans exercising their fundamental constitutional right.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Embassy bombings trial might use 2 juries, judge says
- Bipartisan Senate bill would put kibosh on pricey portraits
- Boehner’s rant brings budget deal
- White House vows more access for photographers
- House OKs slashing contractor salary cap nearly in half; Senate likely to follow suit
- Plane crash kills Hawaii official in Obama’s ‘birther’ fuss
- CIA archives on 1961 Bay of Pigs debacle to stay secret, government says
- 1 in 14 affected by ID theft, survey finds
- GOP makes good on threat to slow confirmations
- New wife pleads guilty in husband’s cliff death
- 52 unsafe bus lines closed in federal crackdown