Ex-first lady backs out of gay-marriage ad
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, 8:18 p.m.
DALLAS — A pro-gay marriage group will replace ads that included former first lady Laura Bush speaking on the topic with a new ad upon learning that she didn't want to be featured as part of its campaign.
The Respect for Marriage Coalition said on Thursday that it appreciates Bush's previous comments “but are sorry she didn't want to be included in an ad.”
The national advertising campaign of print, television and online ads that began Wednesday featured part of a Bush interview on CNN in which she said: “When couples are committed to each other and love each other, then they ought to have the same sort of rights that everyone has.”
The coalition, made up of more than 80 organizations supporting gay marriage, said the ads are part of “a public education campaign that will now move to new and different voices that reflect the depth and breadth of our support.”
The ads include clips of President Obama, former Vice President Dick Cheney and former Secretary of Defense Colin Powell talking favorably about same-sex marriage.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Longtime intel adviser resigns as feds learn of link to China tech company
- Snowstorm silences north Texas
- Pearl Harbor survivor keeps story alive
- Navy deems drone launch from submarine success
- Wind-power companies won’t face federal prosecution in eagle deaths
- Justices to hear critical software case
- GOP unlikely to block ban on plastic guns
- Dems to overlook probe of nominee
- Baker ordered to serve gay couples
- Traffic tickets — and revenue — plunge in Dallas
- Monitor ends bid to force chemo on Ohio girl