Yellowstone snowmobile deal reached
After more than 15 years, the Yellowstone snowmobile wars may have reached an end.
The National Park Service announced on Friday that it has a plan for managing snowmobiles and snow coaches in Yellowstone National Park, a compromise between tour operators eager to bring tourists in during the winter and environmentalists who oppose the pollution and noise accompanying such vehicles.
“We think we've got something they can get behind,” said Yellowstone Superintendent Dan Wenk.
Under the proposal, which will take a few months to finalize, the park will allow 50 snowmobile groups and 60 snow coaches, which are large transport vehicles, to enter daily. During the winter season, which runs from Dec. 15 to March 15, there can be no more than an average of seven snowmobiles in a group, although during peak times operators can take up to 10 snowmobiles in a group.
The popular snow coaches — more than half of Yellowstone's winter visitors come on them — must reduce their vehicle emissions by 25 percent over the next few years, while snowmobiles and snow coaches will be required to run more quietly.
Tour operators and park advocates said they could accept the plan, although they hoped to make small tweaks before it becomes final in the late spring.
“The concept is great,” said Yellowstone Vacations co-owner Randy Roberson, whose family company brings about 5,000 visitors each winter into the park.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- House demands details of Taliban detainees swap for Bergdahl
- Hostility at VA lingers, panel told
- Study a surprise: Commercial bees unfazed by pesticides
- Footage of protesters walking on flag sparks strife at Georgia university
- HIV cases tied to drug use multiply daily in Indiana
- Holder delivers farewell address
- New York City rent increases oust small retailers
- Arizona Sheriff Arpaio investigated wife of judge in racial profiling lawsuit
- Magma chamber spied under Yellowstone volcano
- ‘Organic’ tag on water-raised produce raises ire
- Fraternity announces ‘legal action’ against Rolling Stone magazine over rape article